Xiaomi at long last announced its previous flagship handset with the Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G. But how does it compare to other handsets on the market ?
We ’ve already been lucky enough to try out the top - endXiaomi 13 professional , but now we need to take a closer smell at the budget - focused Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G.
But how does it stack up against other freshly released handset , such as theSamsung Galaxy A54 5 G ? We ’re blend to be looking at all the differences between these devices so you’re able to decide which Android update courtship you well .
They have the same price
Both the Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5 G and Samsung Galaxy A54 5 G will be price at £ 449 in the UK .
That means cost wo n’t take to be a component when you ’re make up one’s mind between the two phones .
The Galaxy A54 5G has a brighter screen
The Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5 gigabyte features a 6.67 - in AMOLED show with a 2400 x 1080 resolution . This compounding should provide users with a crisp experience and vivacious concentrated colours , help by the accompaniment for the DCI - P3 across-the-board color gamut .
Xiaomi also notes that this handset has arefresh rateof up to 120Hz . While it ’s not decipherable yet how low the refresh charge per unit can go – with a small refresh rate being best in term of battery preservation – a 120Hz refresh pace should make jumping between apps and scroll through large documents look smooth and unlined .
The Galaxy A54 5 G boast a similar setup , with a slightly smaller 6.4 - inch Super AMOLED presentation and 1080 x 2340 resolution . The FHD+ resolution on both handset should provide a very similar exploiter experience when watch media , with our first depression noting that the screen seem vivacious and detailed .
Samsung does have a thin edge here , as its French telephone has a peak brightness level of 1,000nits . This should be more than effective enough to be used in bright surround , making it suited to browse or show in verbatim sun .
The Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5 thousand has a superlative luminosity of 900 nit , putting it just behind its Samsung rival . Until we get both of these handsets in for a full review , we ca n’t make too many title about which display feel better to use , but it looks like the Galaxy A54 5 G may deliver the goods out in that department .
MediaTek Dimensity vs Exynos processor
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5 G sport the MediaTek Dimensity 1080 processor , which is built on a slightly older 6 nm process and as the French telephone name suggests , is 5 G ready . Xiaomi claim that this handset pack a potent cooling arrangement with a large 3,000 mm total warmth profligacy area , which should insure that your equipment does not overheat even during intensive tasks , like gaming .
Since we have not been able to test out this phone in full yet , we ca n’t say how rakish it feel to use . However , it should provide smooth performance and thanks to the cooling system , take on some slightly more intensive tasks without too much conflict . Just do n’t expect to run AAA game on such a mid - range chipset .
The Galaxy A54 5 G sports an upgraded 5 nm Exynos 1380 chipset , the latest one in the fellowship ’s roster having been revealed only a few weeks prior to the French telephone ’s announcement . Samsung claim that this microprocessor chip provides a 20%CPUboost and a largerGPUgain of 26 % when compare to its harbinger . We did not note any interim or stutter during our short test stop , but since the Exynos chipset has n’t traditionally been the best at business leader efficiency , we will have to see how it holds up over long menses of meter .
The Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5G features a 200MP main sensor
turn towards the camera readiness - up , the Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5 G features an impressive 200 - megapixel main sensor at 1/1.4 inches . There is also an 8MP ultra - broad sensor , 2MP macro sensor and a 16MP front camera for taking selfies .
Xiaomi claims that this independent sensor has a 159 % betterment in humiliated - light surroundings when compared to its predecessor , as well as the inclusion of ALD ( Atomic Layer Deposition ) , which should allow for for better image performance in complex inflammation conditions . This is also the first Redmi Note French telephone to feature OIS , enabling it to enamor static and clear shot in low - lighting condition .
The Galaxy A54 5 G packs a less telling apparatus , featuring a 50 - megapixel main sensor , 12MP extremist - all-encompassing sensor and 5MP macro lens of the eye , with the last two sensing element being for the most part unchanged from last year’sGalaxy S53 5G. Initial examination shots with this French telephone looked promise when using pixel - binning technical school to press that 50MP ikon into a more usable 12MP image , although they were read in a very well - light environment .
The selfie tv camera on the Galaxy A54 5 gm has been kept the same at 32MP , which should be capable of taking detailed selfie shot . OISalso boast on the main rear sensor , which should start the same static and focused shot as on the Redmi Note 12 Pro+ 5G.
120W HyperCharge on the Note 12 Pro Plus 5G
The Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5 G seems to mob an impressive stamp battery living ; it feature a big 5,000mAh battery as well as 120W HyperCharge , which Xiaomi claims can turn on the French telephone to 100 % in just 19 second .
We ’ll have to take this will a little pinch of salt until we can test this title for ourselves , but it looks like the Redmi Note 12 Pro Plus 5 G could be a victor when it come up to barrage fire . The company claims that this handset boasts ameliorate battery wellness and bombardment efficiency , signify that it should not debilitate too fast during day - to - day usage .
The Galaxy A54 5 G also packs a 5,000mAh battery , however , it fall myopic when it comes to charging . It top out at just 25W , which will not be capable to leave the same fast charging capabilities as HyperCharge , and unlike Xiaomi , there ’s no charging brick in the box either . We can assume that charging up this French telephone will take around two hr , although we have not been able to test this claim yet , make it a lot less alluring for consumers that prioritise shelling life history .
