Meta has launchedThreads , the latest Twitter - alike to hit the grocery store . But , before Threads , there wasBlueskyto stress and tempt users away from Twitter . So , which is better ?

On Twitter these daytime , it finger like you ca n’t go a couple of workweek without a new rival coming out of the woodwork . Have you find out of Spill ? No ? Us neither , until we were research for this article . They are everywhere .

Most get and go but the latest release , Threads , is backed by the Meta behemoth . The new app reasonably takes Instagram ’s formula and coalition dance merge it with Twitter ’s . Bluesky is doing something a little unlike but still in the Twitter sphere . Here ’s how they compare .

A Meta headstart

Bluesky ’s beginning may have begun within Twitter itself but it certainly does n’t have the leg up that Threads does , being a Meta - owned app . Bluesky presently has around 50,000 substance abuser ( viaTechCrunch ) . true sign - ups are presently invite - only so it may drift up once its full loose . We will see .

But , by comparability , Threads has absolutely eclipsed its contender . The new text - based societal media platform already shoot a line upwards of 55 million users ( viaSearchEngineJournal ) . There are many factors that will have caused this rapid explosion but familiarity with already - democratic Meta blade like Facebook and Instagram , as well as well-heeled sign - up to Threads via those accounts , has sure enough played a huge part .

A decentralised fediverse, huh?

If you ’re at all familiar with chat in tech forget me drug around the hereafter of societal media and the internet , there are constant mention of the “ fediverse ” and “ decentralisation ” . If you are n’t intimate , you ’re probably wonder what these rather buzzy row mean and how they apply to these new apps .

Both Bluesky and Threads intend to employ decentralization within their apps . The short version is that this mean communities can be built on seperate networks , allowing for different sets of rules and values to be enforced , but within one app and potentially sharing data . This collective is then have-to doe with to as a “ fediverse ” , a combining of the words confederation and universe .

Bluesky already adopts this approach , allowing you to sign up to different server when you join . For now , Threads runs more like a traditional textual matter - establish societal media platform , i.e. Twitter , with everyone in the same community .

Bluesky isn’t as data-hungry

The privateness conscious should opt for Bluesky right now . When it comes to data point connected to you , rather than anonymised , Bluesky simply vacuums up your email address and the content you post ( viaWIRED ) . Anything else is anonymised and that range of data is also far less than Threads .

On the Threads side of thing , woah nelly . Threads tracks your activity around the web including details such as purchase , location , electronic mail computer address , browsing history and other usage information . Bluesky does none of this . Threads shares this data with third - political party adman and developer .

You can use Threads right now

Meta ’s Threads is available to download on Android and iOS right now . By compare , Bluesky is yet to be amply released and you have to join a waiting tilt . you’re able to also get in via invites from drug user who already have memory access , though they have a limited number invites to give out .

Threads is currently mobile-only

Threads has a lot in usual with its Meta stable companion , Instagram . And , one key style is how it appear to be center on mobile app . you may currently only download Threads on Android and iOS . Of course , there are ways to download these kind of apps on desktops but its not that intuitive and it ’s been a bugbear of Instagram drug user for many year . Whereas Bluesky is approachable on the web .