judgement : I ’ve been take heed to Nura ’s ware for the past mates of month , and when listening to theNuraTrue Pro , it pose me thinking about the truth of individualised sound .
Not truth in the sense of how Nura measures my auditory modality , but accuracy in the sense of whether the end solvent of all that is true to the artist ’s aim . And not to single out Nura , as there are a number of steel that offer personalised sound that includes SoundID , Jabra ’s MySound and others that take a similar approach .
It ’s challenging because if , say , you ’re not as sensory to bass frequencies or high banknote and as a result of the personalisation the headphone boost that area , is that performance faithful to whatever the recording artists or production house intended it to be or is it something else ?
Are you get a line an creative person ’s functioning through the lens of this personalised soundscape ? I presuppose if you were to put the point to one of these personalized sound brands , they would say it would allow the hearer to get word more . Perhaps you could say just turn it off and go without , as with some personalised sound features I ’ve simply not heard a remainder with it on or off . But others have realised a unspoilt performance to the percentage point where the previous tuning sounds drab and tiresome .
At least with the Nura headphones I ’ve been listening to , the levelheaded quality has been consistent , whether I ’m using a dependable radio or an over - capitulum phone . But I would also say that Nura has an idea about how it wants headphones to go , like any other earpiece Lord . Bose has their ideas , which differ fromSony ’s doctrine , which is different toBowers & Wilkins , all informed by chronicle and knowledge . Then you have the effectnoise cancellationcan have on sound lineament , as well as the devices you ’re listening on , which can contribute noise , or with personal euphony players , subtract it from the signal .
And what further up the ante is the increase in resolution . More bits and information permit for a undecomposed reproduction of euphony . The NuraTrue Pro are among the first phone to endorse Qualcomm’saptX Lossless , part of theSnapdragon Soundecosystem . To get the good uncompressed CD tone sound over Bluetooth – at least from Qualcomm ’s view – you ’d require Snapdragon Sound supported products . Throw in individualized sound and will you hear a close reproduction of a 24 - bit/96kHz filing cabinet , or one that ’s filtered through a personalized perspective ? Which one impart more weight in terms of fidelity ? What you may hear or what you should be pick up ?
I have no estimate but , clearly , I do have lots of motion . I suppose at the end of the day if it sounds good to you , then whatever approach works , like it does with headphones that have build - in equaliser options . In that good sense you ’ve always been capable to tailor the phone to what you want , regardless of whether it ’s necessary exact .
I was tell once there ’s always a degree of compromise in products , that if you want the ‘ everlasting ’ audio , you ’d have to pay thousands for that degree of fidelity . Everything is a compromise , it ’s a case of how much . Want the good sound quality then Tidal , Deezer and Qobuz are proficient places to start your audio journeying than Spotify in term of faithfulness .
So when it comes to “ hear music as it ’s mean to be heard ” , what does that in reality mean ? Does that really subsist or is that a motto bandied about . I do n’t have the solution but I ’m intrigued to determine some with this supposedly unexampled era of wireless high faithfulness approaching .
