Verdict
Solid , true , and at last recommend . The Sharp 55FJ7 K Roku TV does n’t wow as much as other Roku models have , but it is a mostly consistent performer that comes with an accessible interface and good set of feature for TV and audio cyclosis .
Pros
Cons
Key Features
Introduction
Sharp is the recent brand to join the social station of Roku video . The Sharp 55FJ7 K is an low-priced , aggregate market manikin with an accent on well out content .
But with so many Roku TVs now available , it begs the question of why should you buy the Sharp over others ? Dolby Vision is one plus , and compatibility with AV1 cyclosis , eARC andHDMI 2.1are others that might make you plump for this TV over the legion of other Roku screens .
Design
Out of its packaging , the Sharp 55FJ7 K look very much like a Roku TV – and that ’s a positive .
Its appearance is tidy , and gathering is quick – it ’s less than three minutes to get it unsloped . It looks not unlike the Metz Roku role model , though the feet are further out , the connections round the back are both side- and downwardly - facing , and the power cable system is wrapped , so it ca n’t be detached .
Like itsMetz Rokustablemate , the cover is musing , so it ’s best placed away from direct lights . Viewing angles are below average – I do n’t have to shift far across the settee for color to lose saturation and black levels to slump . For a 55 - inch sieve that ’s more of a disappointment than it was on the 43 - inch Metz Roku .
Operating System
Visually orientated and easily navigable , the Roku user interface wo n’t win awards for being the most attractive , but this is as fuss - spare and accessible as boob tube interfaces arrive .
The sections are separated into Home , Save List , Freeview Play , Search , Streaming Store , and preferences , and flicking through them is responsive with no noticeable meanwhile . The roving app is even better . Faster , slicker , and with more content at your fingertips . Private hearing is also integrate with a couple of earphone . Have a folk of Roku devices at dwelling house ? They can all be managed through the app too .
Customisation of the home screen is possible by editing the names of inputs and mix apps around . The What to take in feature should be rolling out to this and other Roku TV example in the former month of 2024 , offering users individualise rows of computer programming establish on slew mental object , subscription and wake habits .
Roku has never lacked for apps and all the principal UK catch - up and on - demand option feature through Freeview Play , as well as the usual suspects in Netflix , Disney+ , Apple TV+ , Prime Video , Spotify , and many more .
The picture / phone menu is mostly the same save for a few difference such as fewer audio options on the Sharp Roku than there were on the Metz .
Even more of a letdown is the cardboard - esque remote control . It feels so brassy to manage ; the spongelike release press are so basic that I ’d prefer not to use it . It has shortcuts toPrime Video , Apple TV+ , Freeview Play , Spotify , and Netflix , though I still do n’t understand why there is n’t one for reference inputs .
Features
Ab compatibility for the popular streaming apps is up and down . Prime Video says it playsDolby Vision HDRand Dolby Atmos audio , but when I play subject matter it ’s just in HDR . Netflix supports Dolby Vision but not Atmos , and it ’s the same with Disney+ ( 5.1 sound recording ) andApple TV+ , which I could n’t sustain on the TV if it supported Atmos .
The moving picture painted above is one that does n’t include Dolby Atmos , which is odd as the Sharp 55FJ7 K has aHDMI eARCinput that indorse HDMI 2.1 . I ’m speculating the Sharp can pass - through Atmos from a connected germ to a soundbar , but the apps ca n’t .
patronize sound data format include Dolby Digital , Dolby Digital+ , and Dolby AC-4 through its 20W audio system , while HDR covers Dolby Vision , HDR10 , and HLG ( the latter for TV broadcasts).The AV1 codecis there for high caliber video streaming .
Roku TVs do n’t be given to support MEMC – motion processing – but the Sharp features Active Motion 400 , although I ca n’t see how to enable or disenable it .
Connectivity extend three HDMI 2.1 remark at 4K/60Hz , three RCA , two USB , Ethernet , and antennae inputs , plus a digital opthalmic audio and headphone / line yield . Wi - Fi ( withAirPlay 2support ) is included but there ’s noBluetooth .
I measure stimulus lag at 11.8ms , quick enough to treat FPS and other fast - vellication literary genre . There ’s no build - in voice help , but there are ‘ Works with ’ form of Amazon , Apple , and Google ’s part control that require an external speaker to control .
Picture Quality
The Sharp Roku ’s picture performance is solid , with the key word being Libra the Balance . The 55FJ7 K does n’t produce images with flair , but it is consistent and reminds me of Sharp’s65EQ3EA – and it clean up some of the same outlet too .
It rack up the same brightness peaks asTCL 55RC630 K , hit 377 nits in received mode , 391 in Film mode and 378 nits in Vivid mode . There ’s not a self-aggrandising variant in brightness across modes .
Colour truth appears good out the corner – better than the Metz Roku whether I ’m eyeballing the screen or referring to color measurements ; and while it does n’t boast the punchiest performance , colours take on an agreeable sense of balance .
sit next to anLG OLEDand observe Loki time of year 2 on both , I ’d say the Sharp produce more instinctive skin colour than the LG , which veer towards a reddish hue . It ’s not the sharpest with 4 K subject , and that ’s applicable to both picture current and 4 K Blu - re .
With Lessons in Chemistry ( Apple TV+ ) colours seem a little off . Blacks are a trivial unripe , scenes set at nighttime look slenderly washed out – blacks miss a degree of astuteness , highlights are dim , and line suffers as a result . It ’s ok for a budget goggle box , but it could be reasonably better .
flip to Dolby Vision Dark improves black levels somewhat , but they ’re still not as robust as I ’d like . The telly puts in the diametrical Dolby Vision performance with 4 kilobyte Blu - beam of It : Chapter One and Fast X , with whole disgraceful level and good backlight control .
The scene in the sewers from It are treat well – better than I expected to be reliable – and the torrid explosions in a street race from Fast X are quite literally enlightening , but you ’ll get better , more impactful bursts of brightness level if you shop at in high spirits prices .
The issues I ’ve advert are n’t ruinous , but if I were to take between this shrill video and the TCL Roku when it arrive to HDR , I ’d choose the latter .
As is often the instance with budget TVs , the Sharp 55FJ7 K is on firmer flat coat with HDR SDR content .
Blade Runner in HD features respectably fleshed - out colour , extracting becoming levels of detail from actors ’ faces . There are slightly disconsolate - ish blacks in places , and it ’s not the abrupt image ( likely baked into the reservoir ) but it is fine .
A DVD of Hellboy : The Golden Army is undisputedly soft , but the racket in the simulacrum is steady deal . Like with a Pack of Lies , the richness of the colours in the fairy world ( redness , orange , and blacks ) really stand up out . edge are drawn quiet enough , though when it ’s trade with hunky-dory details , the Sharp fall prey to noise . It ’s solid – there ’s that word again – and it sum up up the Sharp 55FJ7 K ’s operation .
Sound Quality
There ’s not much , if any , pizzaz to this telly ’s sound , nor does the audio expand beyond the ( wise - looking ) border of the TV .
Bass output has a vacuous thump to it . In It : Chapter One , the saltation scares do n’t land with much force which deadens the exhilaration .
The Dialogue Enhancer is reliably coherent if you ca n’t hear some dialogue , but I did find that dialogue in Fast X sound slightly muffled and lack sharpness . The TV seems to err towards a warm , smooth output , which I do n’t mean works for some audio modes .
Stick with Auto / Standard as it is the clearest , sharpest , and advantageously - limit musical mode – and it sounds bigger too . If not , there ’s always an affordable soundbar to give this TV the boost it involve .
Latest deals
Should you buy it?
A few image inconsistencies aside , this Sharp Roku fork out a balanced pictorial matter and a respectable cortege of features , though theTCL RC630Kis better in my appraisal .
TheTCL RC630Kis a upright option in the A / V section , and still useable for £ 399 . It ’s ourbest budget TVof 2023 for a reasonableness .
Final Thoughts
Solid and goodish are the Word that come to my mind regarding the Sharp 55FJ7 K Roku television receiver . It ’s a utterly ok entree into the Roku TV line - up .
It reminds me of theHisense Roku A7200Gwith its understated yet colourful depiction , but the seeming lack of make - in Dolby Atmos is odd when seem at the feature - solidifying , and the set ’s shameful levels can be inconsistent depending on the source .
TheTCL Rokuwasn’t perfect , but it did bring up the storey for Roku TVs . This Sharp does n’t attain it , but that ’s not to say you do n’t get mass of bang for your one dollar bill . check off out ourbest cheap TVguide for more alternative .
Trusted Score
How we test
We test every television we brush up soundly over an protracted time period of fourth dimension . We use industry stock tests to compare feature of speech in good order . We ’ll always tell you what we find . We never , ever , take money to review a merchandise .
detect out more about how we try in ourethics policy .
FAQs
The Sharp 55FJ7 K is compatible with the VESA 400 x 300 mm bulwark - mount .
