Verdict
One of the brightest OLED television on the securities industry , but the Samsung ’s picture operation is not as nuanced or expressive as its Dolby Vision compatible rivals . Add in a middling auditory sensation system and there are better alternatives if Ab execution is the focal point .
Pros
Cons
Key Features
Introduction
Samsung returned to the OLED company because it believe the TV screen tech had n’t action its true potential difference .
One of the criticism fielded against OLED has been its deficiency of cleverness compared to LCD goggle box , from not being capable to offer the full colour gamut range to only performing their skillful in rooms that are n’t brilliantly lighted .
That ’s changed of late , spurred in part because of Samsung ’s new OLED , with the S95C OLED the latest fruit of its labours .
entrust Reviews has already reexamine the65 - inch model , though I ca n’t say I partake in the same stage of enthusiasm with the QE55S95C.
Design
Samsung ’s desire to make the thinnest TV display is evident with the S95C as it has a depth of just 11 mm .
I dread that ’s had a negative shock on the good arrangement , but more on that by and by . The uniform flatness of the CRT screen , along with Samsung ’s One Connect Box , makes it idealistic for paries hanging . The One Connect Box powers the display and feast it television and audio signals via a cable – two of which are supplied in short and long versions .
With the standpoint attached , the One Connect is affix to its back . It ’s a unexampled assemblage design for the standpoint that ’s more unassailable – less prone to sliding off if the TV is bump into .
With a weighting of 23.9 kilogram with the rack , that ’s heavier than the65 - inch LG C3 . Remove the rack and it ’s 13.8 kilo , which point how much weight the rack / box supply . It does , however , give stable support to the CRT screen and is tall enough for a soundbar to time slot beneath .
Viewing angles are splendid . OLED is inherently ripe at wider slant , butQD - OLED ’s high brightness ( compare to ‘ stock ’ OLED screens ) sees much better retention of brightness . There ’s an Anti - Reflective coat on the screen and , though it does n’t rebuff all reflections , it deals with a proficient absolute majority of them .
Like theS90C , the S95C lacks a polarizer , so in bright rooms the TV can turn a nicety of Zane Grey . wrench off the twinkle and this is less of an issue , but part of QD - OLED ’s charm is that it ’s vivid enough to resist the backwash of ambient visible radiation , however it seems the shameful level do n’t always live intact .
Tizen interface
Like the S90C , the Tizen port on the S95C is speedier than the 2022 edition . There are still moments when it can get briefly ‘ stuck ’ , usually when I ’ve exited an app . It also annoys that , on power up , the interface return to the generator last used , which often leads to power up a connected machine or opening an app I did n’t want it to .
The ‘ options ’ and ‘ Connected Devices ’ shelves are not well highlighted within the port . If you were n’t cognizant of what the three horizontal lines on the left-hand - helping hand side of the CRT screen did , which is to open this region of the interface , I doubt you ’d retrieve twice about flick on it .
Where Samsung ’s Tizen interface has always been reliable is the wealth of apps it extend . All the UK collar - up and on - need apps are provided : there’sNetflix , Disney+ , Prime Video , Apple TV+ , and YouTube as the big striker on the video side ; Tidal , Spotify , Qobuz , Apple Music , BBC fathom on the audio side , as well as over a thousand more apps .
Samsung is also making a dent in the free - to - access streaming side with itsTV Plus inspection and repair . No sign - up is required ( unless you require to keep open and continue watch substance across devices ) and it offer springy and on - demand computer programing .
Search is through the Universal Guide , with which you could range content across all apps , and there ’s Bixby vocalism lookup .
And if voice control condition does n’t float your gravy boat , the S95C comes with two remote . One is minimalist with a few buttons – flip it over and it can charge itself by soaking up ambient ignitor or by being link to aUSB - cytosine porthole . The other is the more received distant with many more buttons .
Features
All four of the HDMI inputs are grade toHDMI 2.1standard . That includesauto low-spirited latent period mode , eARC for machine-accessible audio systems , and up to 4K/144Hz refresh rate for gaming .
The Gaming Hub includes cloud gaming apps such as Xbox Game Pass , Amazon Luna , Utomik , andGeForce Now . PC gamers get AMD FreeSync Premium VRR , and Super Ultra all-encompassing Game View screen ratios of 21:9 and 32:9 . HDR10 + Gaming is patronage with compatible displays , and Nvidia G - Sync works with the S95C , but the TV is not certify for it .
you’re able to enjoy class - lead input lag for play as I measured latency at 9.2ms , guarantee a snappy performance for all game , and withHDMI VRRand high refresh rates you’re able to revel even low latency on the S95C.
The rest of the connectivity adds up to two USB ports : Ethernet , digital visual out , CI Slot , and antennae for terrestrial and satellite provider cover your physical port , with Wi - Fi 5 and Bluetooth 5.2 to cast to and rain buckets from the TV .
Along with Bixby voice mastery there ’s ramp up - inAmazon Alexa , andSmartThingssupport places the boob tube within a sassy home setup . If you have a SmartThings account , it ’s easy to set the TV up through the app than the removed control .
Picture Quality
I was mixed overall with the S90C ’s picture carrying into action , a telly up to of undimmed HDR trope but was less dexterous when fed darker HDR depicted object . Colours mislay some of the lustre and came across as coolheaded and flat in appearance , pitch-dark point ( in a bright room ) erred towards gray and with some configurations there was clipping ( exit of detail ) in the promising area .
The Samsung QE55S95C still suffers from those problems in my opinion , but to a less extent . disastrous stratum feel solid , attain more of an inky profundity in Marvel ’s unavowed Invasion . semblance are n’t as coolly described as Fury and Talos head over to a general ’s sign of the zodiac , although the S95C lacks the same punchy colours and rich complexions theSony A80L ’s Dolby Vision performance can provide .
I do still have scruple about how the idiot box handles dark view whether in HDR or SDR . The ‘ Gom Jabbar ’ scenery from Dune ( Prime Video ) on the S95C completely ignores the fleeceable chromaticity of Paul ’s clothes and the environment , while complexions are frigid and lacking in colour , and smutty levels can look crushed in some scenes and grey in others . It ’s a funny performance , particularly as the video was in its Movie style ( the Sony was in Custom modality ) .
The S95C ’s tendency to crush blacks is seeable in a Blu - ray of The Amazing Spider - Man 2 . In a relatively palely ignite scene between an inauspicious Norman Osborn and his boy Harry , the TV muddle item in the dark role , where the same scene on the Sony A80L reveals much more dark contingent .
by from that , the Neural Quantum Processor 4 K does a very capable job in upscaling less - than 4 KB content . The color in The Amazing Spider - Man 2 ( inFilmmaker modal value ) are copious ; the Marxist and blue of Spidey ’s superhero costume look spot on .
Levels of clarity and particular are secure ; black levels are deep , demarcation is well convey , and skin tones have colour to them and obviate looking washed out . The Sony conveys a more rude and nuanced ikon , but the S95C still looks good .
drop down to a DVD of The Bourne Ultimatum and it looks much better than expected . The 55 - inch projection screen size likely helps in term of the pixel tally , and while there ’s still resound to contend with in the film ’s fast zoom and jittery camera piece of work , the Samsung S95C header with it all in a solid personal manner .
Colours appear natural , and the S95C ’s processor can labour up a decent grade of detail in people ’s faces , apparel , and objects . Edge definition is another region where the goggle box is decent in , avoiding fuzziness with the abstract of fibre ’ typeface and body . It ’s still an obvious step down from HD resolution , peculiarly in terms of clearness , but watchable all the same .
4 thou HDR content is the Samsung S95C ’s bread and butter , contribute out its best performance . I evaluate summit brightness on a 10 % HDR window in the Standard picture mode at 1172 nit ( in Dynamic it ’s over 1200 nit ) . That ’s better than the LG C3 ( 832 nits ) and Sony A80L ( 724 nit ) , which puts the S95C in good standing in damage of its HDR functioning and cop with bright rooms .
The S95C reproduce the cornucopia of Top Gun : Maverick ’s photography with its ‘ gilded hour ’ look well , as the aspect in Penny ’s legal profession is full of rich , warm oranges that counterpoint with lovely - sounding , inscrutable blacks . The Orange River of the character ’ skintones looks great ( as well as exact to the film producer ’s intent ) , and there ’s none of that red push premature QD - OLED have shown .
The IMAX scenes exhibit pin - acute lucidity and detail , with first-class contrast in both day and night scenes . Top Gun : Maverick look great on this television .
And so does Avatar : The way of life of Water in a 4 K HDR10 Disney+ swarm . find out it at the same time with the Sony A80L reveals a few differences ; one is the average brightness level on the Samsung is good , clean tones are brighter ; specular highlight and even subtitles of the Na’vi terminology are more acute on the S95C. The orange slug to explosion George Burns with more force – the Samsung taps into the potential of HDR more .
I do receive the blue / peacock blue skintones of the different Na’vi clans strike a salutary tone on the A80L. The Samsung S95C deals with complexions with a slightly lighter , less unshakable tone , and I favour the strong , deeper tones on the A80L , which feel more like how the Na’vi should look .
There is a somewhat wide-eyed range of colours on the Samsung ; it ’s a small shining in some position , a little darker in others , but the differences are mostly elusive than glaringly obvious . shadower point is again better on the Sony , with Dolby Vision giving the A80L a salutary peek into the pic ’s darker parts .
pose the Contrast Enhancer set to ‘ High ’ and there ’s more slug to colours as well as a considerable increase to brightness that stands out , but skintones can bet too brilliant – almost decolourise – and in shooter of the sky there is clipping .
Like with the S90C , there ’s a choice of Standard and Active HDR shade mapping . Standard is more accurate while Active increases brightness . With the latter , subject see too bright but I ca n’t deny the optic pop it commit , and it ’ll work well in bright - light up room environments .
Doctor Sleep is not the most visually alluring pic – a mint of its scenes are more about the subtlety and darkness – and the S95C give a safe showing in this respect . TheHDR10+playback emphasize black tier and adds a few more shade of green and blue in the film ’s night - time scenes .
Complexions do slip towards the cooler side of the spectrum and it ’s a like take watching Captain Marvel on Disney+ . The Sony A80L offer up a warmer , more expressive look , though it can be contend the S95C draw more detail from the actors ’ look .
If there ’s one thing I would stress about Samsung ’s 2023 OLEDs , it ’s the lack of punch and heat overall to colours and people ’s complexion . There ’s a flatness to some colours that does n’t take advantage of the QD - OLED ’s military posture .
One last face of the Samsung S95C ’s motion picture public presentation is its motion processing . Happily , it ’s better out of the boxful than the S90C , smoother and clear with the Custom clarity determine when watching 1917 , though it suffer from a less than stable image with the Auto mount as judder , jerky movement , lag , and stutter become very intrusive .
With The English ( iPlayer ) there ’s haphazardness around the legs of a horse as it gallop across blind with the Custom place setting . If you stand for to apply motion processing , stick with the Custom setting , and edit it how you need , as artefacts are less egregious .
Sound Quality
The S95C ’s legal system , like its painting calibre , is better than the S90C but it ’s the most disappointing aspect about the TV . Both Samsung ’s 2023 OLED are a step back from the2022 S95B.
In a neat fight between the Samsung S95C and Sony A80L , the Sony is easy the victor . While dialogue on the Samsung is clearly relayed , it ’s not as audible nor is it projected from the screen as strongly even though it has 70W of power at its disposal in its 4.2.2 channel solidification - up .
At the same bulk level , the S95C sound reserved compared to the energy and dynamism the Sony can summon . Background detail and euphony grade on the Samsung are less prominent , and even in its Amplify mode there ’s less particular to grok on the S95C. Notably , it performs well with non - Dolby audio tracks with more punch and clarity .
At least with its OTS ( Object Tracking Sound ) system there ’s a better sense of height than the S90C offered as biplane vaporize over No Man ’s Land in 1917 , but when it comes to basso it ’s afflicted with the same problem as the entering - level OLED . Any sentence the speakers are stressed there ’s balmy buzzing nowadays .
I feel it ’s due to the S95C ’s slim human body that does n’t allow the loudspeaker to shift much air to bring forth punch , power , or heft . The Sony A80L and Panasonic MZ1500 are miles in the lead of the S95C , and the overall imprint I get is Samsung would favor you add one of its own soundbars to this telly . I would not disagree with that notion .
Latest deals
Should you buy it?
A flush light of up to 1200 nits build the Samsung S95C a firm choice for HDR and viewing in a bright lit room .
good than the S90C , but the S95C still support from the same issue but to a somewhat lesser extent . There are OLED TVs from LG , Sony , and Panasonic that are more expressive in both photograph and auditory sensation .
Final Thoughts
To lump in a football related metaphor , the Samsung QE55S95C is a unseasoned actor with plenty of potentiality that it has n’t in full realize .
It is better than the entry - level S90C QD - OLED : improved colour , better black levels , and a in high spirits brightness performance ca-ca it a good choice for bright rooms . However , it ’s arguably sacrificed its audio performance for aesthetics , with the sound so reserved that I would commend budgeting for a soundbar to go with this screen .
The price has drop significantly since launching , but nonetheless its delineation execution is neither as nuanced nor as expressive as OLED TVs from LG , Sony , and Panasonic . The S95C can hit telling highschool but the competition is better .
Trusted Score
How we test
We test every television we review good over an extended period of time . We expend industry standard tests to compare feature properly . We ’ll always tell you what we obtain . We never , ever , accept money to survey a product .
Find out more about how we test in ourethics policy .
FAQs
There ’s no Dolby Vision HDR support for the Samsung S95C. It supports HDR10 + dynamic metadata instead .
