consider a VR headset but not certain where to set forth ? We ’ve compared two of our favourite headsets to assist you decide .
We afford thePico 4 Ultraa near - perfect 4.5 - whiz valuation and acclaim the headset as “ superb ” and “ future - proof ” . We also awarded theMeta Quest 3a 4.5 - star military rank and described the gadget as “ an easy choice for VR fans ” .
So what are the real differences between the two VR headset and which one should you go for ? We ’ve compare the spectacles of the Pico 4 Ultra and Meta Quest 3 to help oneself you make up one’s mind which VR headset is well suited for you .
Pricing and Availability
The Pico 4 Ultra is uncommitted in just one 256 GB size of it , with an RRP of £ 529/€599 .
On the other hand , the Meta Quest 3 is available in a option of two storage sizes , 128 GB and 512 GB , with a initiate RRP of £ 479 .
It ’s deserving note that both headset can be find with solid discounts from major retailer such as Amazon .
Design and Fit
If fingerprints and spot are a bugaboo then the Meta Quest 3 is arguably a more suitable option , as it does n’t sport a glazed black visor on the front like thePico 4 Ultra . Instead , theMeta Quest 3has a white-hot plastic shield which is much more fingerprint - proof .
Otherwise , both headset have balanced weight distribution for comfortable gameplay that does n’t sense heavy after even extend periods of time . For additional ease , the Pico 4 Ultra consists of a magnetically detachable framework facial port with a spacer for prescription lenses while the Quest 3 also has a lucullan , soft cushioning that helps relieve any contact pressure .
There ’s also space in the Quest 3 for chicken feed - wearers , although there is the option to go for specially calibrated lense if that ’s what you ’d prefer .
While we had zero issues with the Pico 4 radical headset ’s over - the - principal , hook - and - cringle shoulder strap , the Quest 3 ’s takes some getting used to . If you do find it too knavish then it is potential to bribe dissimilar shoulder strap , however this is an additional cost to factor in .
Finally , we found the two speaker systems of the headsets offer cleared , frosty and gimcrack auditory sensation , with the Quest 3 in finical offering a “ seemly spatial experience ” for immersive gameplay .
Winner : Pico 4 Ultra
Controllers
There are n’t many differences between the Pico 4 Ultra and Quest 3 ’s controllers as both sport a ringless blueprint which cook for a more ergonomic and comfortable experience . The two sets of controllers also provide a familiar layout which includes a initiation and grip buttons on each handle , plus a thumbstick , A and Bel button on the correct controller and an X and Y push on the left .
Pico also includes new motion tracker which are lowly , hoary pucks that seize to stretchable hook - and - loop straps for each ankle .
Although the Quest 3 ’s controllers are n’t necessarily laborious , at 103 g each they are importantly weightier than the Pico 4 Ultra ’s controllers which come in at a somewhat 38.5 g each .
While a rechargeable battery clique for the controller would be more convenient , the Quest 3 and Pico 4 Ultra both postulate twoAA batteriesfor major power .
Specs and Features
Both the Pico 4 Ultra and Meta Quest 3 run on Qualcomm ’s powerfulSnapdragon XR2 Gen 2chipset which offers speedy performance , telling efficiency and AI - infused prick . The Pico 4 Ultra boasts the edge however , as it lark 12 GB of RAM whereas the Quest 3 has just 8 GB of RAM .
Having said that , we found that the Quest 3 still hunt down smoothly so this should n’t necessarily put you off .
The Pico 4 Ultra shoot a line a pair of high fidelity 32MP RGB cameras which , when combined with an iToF deepness - smell out camera , are hailed as “ best - in - class ” for pass - through and mixed realness faithfulness . The Quest 3 , on the other hand , employ just 4MP RGB cameras , however we still found the headset boasts telling mixed reality capabilities thanks to its new deepness sensing element which allow for gentle boundary creation .
The Pico 4 Ultra also allows you to beguile and transfer spatial videos shot on compatible iPhones or with the Apple Vision Pro and take in the message via the Pico headset . Although doubtless impressive , this is a freshness more than a intellect to grease one’s palms .
We did struggle with the Pico 4 ’s extremist hand and movement tracking which both take a routine more getting used to . Although the apparent motion tracker are comfortable to set up , they did have a surd prison term mirroring ramification bm . On the other hired hand , although the Quest 3 ’s hand tracking is n’t complete , we did see a obtrusive divergence compare to its herald theQuest 2 .
Otherwise , both headset offer laconic visuals with the Pico 4 Ultra offering a declaration of 2160 x 2160 per middle while the Quest 3 provides a resolution of 2064 x 2208 per eye .
Games and software
Although the Pico 4 Ultra does have the potential drop to be a sincerely fantastic , all - round VR headset , what let it down is its secret plan catalogue which pales in comparison to Meta ’s .
Since its launch we ’ve seen huge games promised to be exclusive to Pico , such as Just Dance VR , but then such game will then choose for Meta compatibility instead . Although Pico does boast some self-aggrandizing title , for sheer volume and versatility Meta advance .
It ’s also deserving noting that in our review we found that , although the Pico 4 Ultra is rat for those senior 13 and over , it was all too easy to get at adult mental object . Although this is n’t necessarily a rarefied occurrence for VR headset , users simply should n’t be capable to occur upon adult content without warning .
Aside from message consumption , the Pico 4 Ultra countenance you to divvy up your aspect with other devices by casting to the Pico app , a TV or a connection web browser . Similarly , you may access website on the Quest 3 in mixed reality and side - load apps like PS Remote Play for cloud gambling with a Bluetooth restrainer .
victor : Meta Quest 3
Battery Life
With a 5700mAh barrage mobile phone , the Pico 4 Ultra can deliver up to four hours of use on a single charge , whereas the Meta Quest 3 variation a smaller 4879mAh cellphone which provides around three hour .
Not only that but the Pico 4 Ultra benefits from 45W truehearted charging which provides the headset with a full charge in just over an hour , whereas the Meta Quest 3 takes around two and a one-half hours to recharge due to its 30W charging capacity .
It ’s deserving noting however that to benefit from the fast charging power of the Pico 4 Ultra , you will require to corrupt a Quick Charge compatible courser .
Verdict
The Pico 4 Ultra VR headset boasts heaps of impressive features from a easy design , long bombardment life and speedy , powerful operation .
However , deliberate the Meta Quest 3 sports a with child catalogue of game and apps , plus it runs on the same powerful Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor as the Pico 4 Ultra and has a smudge - proof eyeshade , it ’s perhaps easy to urge the former headset .
Plus , considering the Meta Quest 3 has a more or less chintzy begin RRP ( although the difference is negligible ) , if you want access code to thousands of games and apps for less , then you should weigh the Meta Quest 3 .
Specs comparison table
