The Oppo discover N3 Flip is a capable foldable smartphone that calculate to bring the fighting to Samsung , but how does it compare to one of our preferred foldables around , the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra ?
TheOppo witness N3 Fliphas a bunch going for it include a triple tv camera system that include a consecrate telephotograph lens – a first for clamshell - style foldables – and a great software experience , but it has its workplace trim down out for it if it wants to contend with theMotorola Razr 40 Ultra .
That ’s because the Razr 40 Ultra is presently ranked as ourtop grapple - mode foldablehere atTrusted Reviews , disport a gorgeous display , genuinely helpful cover display features , a great television camera system and top - ending power .
So , does Oppo do enough to slip the crown from Motorola ? We ’ve expend flock of time with both the Oppo feel N3 Flip and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra , and here ’s how the two equivalence .
Pricing and availability
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra launched back in June 2023 with a £ 1,049 monetary value shred , although you’re able to find it slightly inexpensive in former 2024 if you face in the right places .
The Oppo happen N3 Flip is a small morsel more unmanageable to get your custody on ; while the Find N2 Flip was loose in the UK , the same ca n’t be say for the Find N3 Flip , which is currently only available in the Middle East and Asia at around S$1499 / INR 94,999 ( ~$1126/£890 ) – though there will likely be additional import fees if you do adjudicate to buy from abroad .
Design and screen
When it comes to general flesh agent , both the Oppo Find N3 Flip and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra are like . They ’re both clamshell - style foldable smartphones , after all .
But there are plenty of differences between the two . The most obvious when face at the two earphone is the sizing of their respective cover displays ; while Oppo has choose for a 3.3 - in portrait - orientated screen , Motorola has gone all in and squeezed in a turgid 3.6 - in screen that takes up much of its front cover .
It ’s not just larger either ; it ’s smoother at 144Hz , higher resolution at 1056 x 1066 and it even supportsHDR10+content . The Oppo Find N3 Flip ’s cover exhibit , on the other hand , boasts a relatively low resolution of 382 x 720 that our referee felt could ’ve been higher as it made certain on - screen elements look a little soft . It ’s also capped at 60Hz .
But the bigger difference come with what you’re able to really do with those cover display . While Oppo has a handful of first - party gizmo and access to a small-scale phone number of third - party apps , you could access any Android app from the Razr ’s cover display , get it directly more utile .
Unfold the phones and you ’ll find folding AMOLED screens within , but like with the cover display , the two companies diverge when it comes to specifics . The Oppo Find N3 Flip has a shining 6.8 - inch exhibit with a liquid 120Hz refresh charge per unit and 1600nits peak luminousness that our reader thoroughly enjoyed during testing , with the punchy colour palette make it a goody for watch over movies on the go .
The Razr 40 Ultra , on the other helping hand , comes in with a slenderly larger 6.9 - inch AMOLED display – making it one of the biggest 21:9 screens around – with a alike smattering of tech including a120Hz refresh charge per unit , support or HDR10 + and a pixel - packed resolving power , though it ’s notquiteas smart at 1400nits .
Whichever you opt for , there ’s one matter you wo n’t call for to worry about ; the ill-famed seam . While we ’ve still got a manner to go until it truly disappears , both Motorola and Oppo have made significant strides on this front . Looking front - on , you ca n’t see a line at all , and there ’s only a small-scale tactile change when persist your finger over it .
Elsewhere , the Oppo Find N3 Flip is the chunkier of the two foldables at 7.8 mm thick and 198 gibibyte , compared to 7 mm and 185 g from the Razr 40 Ultra . The Razr 40 Ultra also apply more premium material include 7000 Series aluminum and stainless sword as well as Gorilla Glass Victus to protect the glass .
The only intensity the Oppo discovery N3 Flip has is itsIPX4 water resistance , something that Motorola ’s foldable does n’t offer .
Cameras
The Oppo find oneself N3 Flip has the upper hand when it comes to television camera performance , lark about a triplex camera setup compared to the threefold - photographic camera offer from the Razr 40 Ultra . Not only that , but the regain N3 Flip ’s sensors are all of a higher megapixel reckoning than Motorola ’s alternative – though as we know , there ’s more to a practiced tv camera than the megapixel count .
That order , our reader was very impressed with the Find N3 Flip ’s camera performance . The principal 50MP f/1.8 OIS - enabled snapper was performant in both well - lit and low - light environments with mickle of detail and vibrant colours , backed up by a 48MP ultrawide and , notably , a 32MP 2x telephoto lense . The latter is unique among clamshell foldables , with others relying on digital rapid growth instead of a dedicated zoom sensing element .
That makes the Find N3 Flip a pretty versatile gun , allowing you to both get faithful and farther from the action without any negligible downgrade in terminal figure of overall simulacrum quality .
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra , on the other paw , sport a main 12MP f/1.5 snapper and 13MP ultrawide that , while capable to let more visible radiation in with a wider aperture , ca n’t take reward of pixel - bin tech to boost the light and particular in nip .
Our referee was still very glad with the images he took with the Razr 40 Ultra during the review period , but there ’s no deny that the Find N3 Flip ’s triple camera setup stay the more versatile of the two .
Performance and software
Neither the Oppo Find N3 Flip nor Motorola Razr 40 Ultra offer the very latest in smartphone processing power , but they ’re notthatfar off either .
You might assume that the newer Find N3 Flip welfare principally here , using a slightly young MediaTek Dimensity 9200 compare to the Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 from the Razr 40 Ultra , but even with the same combination of 12 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage , the Razr 40 Ultra pull ahead in the bench mark tests we lam at Trusted Reviews .
According to our tests , the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra has better central processor execution and GPU performance compared to the newer Oppo Find N3 Flip , though it ’s deserving noting that we found both phone to be equally rapid and responsive in everyday purpose , though they ’re phones that ’ll get pretty warm if you essay and play high - remnant games on them for long menstruum of time .
When it comes to software , the Oppo Find N3 Flip and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra disagree quite a act . Both ship with the slightly sure-enough Android 13 rather than Android 14 , though an update to both is guaranteed sometime in the dear future . However , while Motorola provide a pretty faithful - to - blood Android experience , the same ca n’t be said for Oppo ’s ColorOS .
To be bonny to Oppo , it has one of the more pleasant third - party Android skins out there with a handful of ready to hand Oppo feature like Shelf , XL folders on the home screen and more that enhance the Android experience . But for Android purists , the Razr 40 Ultra is the way to go , with the only Motorola - branded changes focused on the handy Moto Actions .
The Oppo Find N3 Flip has good long - term support , offer 4 O upgrade and 5 year of security measure patches compared to the combining of 3 and 4 from the Razr 40 Ultra , meaning the N3 Flip will end up with Android 17 while the Razr will be stupefy on Android 16 .
Battery life
When it comes to battery animation , the Oppo Find N3 Flip and Motorola Razr 40 Ultra are fairly equally matched despite the fact that the former has a heavy battery than the latter at 4300mAh and 3800mAh respectively . But despite this disparity in cellphone size of it , both delivered all - day battery life during testing , though without much left in the tank by the time it come in to bedtime .
More specifically , our reviewer find that the Motorola Razr 40 Ultra would usually finish the Clarence Shepard Day Jr. with around 15 - 30 % in the cooler , while the Oppo Find N3 Flip would unremarkably end up at the 15 % gull after a day ’s manipulation . These will get you through a day of manipulation , just about , but they likely wo n’t be two - day gadget for many people .
Thankfully , both put up fast charging capability , though the Oppo recover N3 Flip ’s 44W speeds beat the 30W on offer from Motorola . But , with a large shelling from the former , it think that both hold the exact same 59 minute to go from flat to full during examination .
The Motorola Razr 40 Ultra also benefits from 5W wireless charging , a feature of speech not offer by Oppo ’s young choice .
Verdict
The Oppo discover N3 Flip is a solid foldable that fixes a circumstances of complaints from the N2 Flip , boasting one of the good clamshell folding camera systems around , a squeamish compact plan , lovely screen and sorcerous package .
However , the Razr 40 Ultra is not only thinner , lighter and made from more durable materials , but it ’s more brawny , has larger screen and internal display and is generally the more equal to of the two .
immix with the fact that the Find N3 Flip is extremely difficult to buy in the UK and Europe and it ’s clear that the Razr 40 Ultra has a win on its manus here .
Spec comparison
Benchmark comparison
