Meta has announced its up-to-the-minute mixed realism headset in the form of the Quest 3S , a much more budget - friendly choice to the top - destruction Meta Quest Pro .

turn over the Quest 3S has a take off RRP of under £ 300 , whereas the Quest Pro starts at a whopping £ 999 , does splurging guarantee more features ?

We ’ve compared the specs of the upcoming Quest 3S to the 3.5 - starQuest Proto aid you decide whether it ’s worth opt for the more expensive headset .

Virtual meeting in progress shown on Meta Quest Pro.

Spec comparison

Price

The Meta Quest 3S is currently uncommitted for pre - order in front of launching on 15th October . usable in two sizes , 128 GB or 256 GB , the Quest 3S has a starting RRP of £ 289.99/$299.99 .

The Meta Quest Pro was one of the first mixed world headsets , having launched back in 2022 with an RRP of £ 999/$999 for the sole 256 GB model . However , Meta confirmed in previous September 2024 that the Quest Pro has been discontinued and will only stay on in stores while stock lasts .

The Quest Pro has face and eye-tracking technology

Unlike the Quest 3S , the Quest Pro boast face- andeye - trackingsensors that allow the headset to cut across your gaze and facial facial expression and employ this datum in VR apps . This allows musician to interact more intuitively within games while also offering a more lifelike societal experience , specially in apps likeMeta Horizon .

We found this engineering allow you to better communicate with people in VR and is able-bodied to “ pick up on the pocket-size nuances in human communication ” . However as this technology can only be ascertain in the Quest Pro , the people you ’re interact with will also need the headset in order for you to gain from it .

The Quest 3S has a higher max refresh rate

Perhaps surprisingly as it ’s the more affordable option , the Quest 3S offer a 90 - 120Hz refresh rate which means graphic are smoother and more realistic , able to render between 90 and 120fps .

Comparatively , the Quest Pro only reach 90Hz , which means it falls short not only of the Quest 3S and theQuest 2but also thePS VR2 .

The Quest Pro has a larger battery

The Quest Pro ’s battery has a 5348mAh cell while the Quest 3S has a slightly smaller 4324mAh capacity . Even so , Meta states that both headset have a 2.5 - hour runtime , though as we ’re yet to test the Quest 3S , we ca n’t confirm if this is the pillow slip .

you could also extend the Pro ’s bombardment life to three hours by switching off face and centre tracking but that defeats the purpose of the headset . In our revue of the Pro , we were entrust disappoint with its electric battery performance , especially when you weigh the mellow price tag .

The Quest Pro also offer convenient charging of both the headset and the controllers via the included dock . or else , the Quest 3S practice a USB - C port to reload the headset while the controllers are powered by AAA batteries that will postulate replacing .

Virtual meeting in progress shown on Meta Quest Pro.

The controllers on the Quest Pro are self-tracked

Much like the Quest 3 , the Quest 3S ’ controllers need to be in view of the head - mount display ( HMD ) for tracking whereas the Quest Pro comptroller can be tracked without being in view of the HMD .

The self - trailing of the Quest Pro is possible thanks to its three tv camera sensors and build - in chipset for spatial deliberation , while the Quest 3S ’ tracking practice computer vision and machine encyclopaedism .

The Quest 3S uses the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 chipset

Despite being the more low-cost option , the Quest 3S runs on a newer chipset than the Quest Pro . While the latter uses 2022 ’s Snapdragon XR2 Plus Gen 1 , the Quest 3S or else utilize 2023 ’s Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 processor .

Both processors are designed for XR ( extend reality ) , with the Snapdragon XR2 Plus Gen 1 offering “ increase power and caloric performance and intelligent computer vision ” compare to the previous generation .

The Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 is also found in the full - fatMeta Quest 3 , and we praise its souped - up performance in our reexamination of that headset . We ’re expecting alike things from the Quest 3S , but we ’ll have to go eyes - on to sustain .

Virtual meeting in progress shown on Meta Quest Pro.

Early Verdict

Although we have n’t go over the Quest 3S yet , it promises to be a budget - well-disposed headset that still brag premium features and a adequate to chipset .

At this other stage , we ’d recommend prefer for the 3S if you ’re look for a more affordable way to benefit from VR . However , if you ’d choose to make use of eye and face tracking technology then the Quest Pro might be a better option for you .

Virtual meeting in progress shown on Meta Quest Pro.

Virtual meeting in progress shown on Meta Quest Pro.

Quest 3 and Quest 3S

Quest 3 and Quest 3S

Quest 3 and Quest 3S

Meta Quest Pro controller and headset on a table.

Meta Quest Pro controller and headset on a table.

Meta Quest Pro controller and headset on a table.

Quest 3S displaying Snapdragon chip

Quest 3S displaying Snapdragon chip

Quest 3S displaying Snapdragon chip

Virtual meeting in progress shown on Meta Quest Pro.

Virtual meeting in progress shown on Meta Quest Pro.

Quest 3 and Quest 3S

Quest 3 and Quest 3S

Meta Quest Pro controller and headset on a table.

Meta Quest Pro controller and headset on a table.

Quest 3S displaying Snapdragon chip

Quest 3S displaying Snapdragon chip