Verdict

The Emberton II boasts the same stylish looks as the original exemplar , but benefit from pinch to its audio and app support , while also boosting dust - resistance and battery liveliness . As a wireless speaker you could take to the park , beach or on holiday – the Emberton II comes extremely recommended .

Pros

Cons

Key Features

Introduction

harmonize to Marshall , the Emberton II is its Empire Strikes Back of portable speaker system – it has a conversant tone to the original , but offers improvements in several ways .

Of of course , a brandwouldbe inclined to say positive thing about its in style portable verbaliser , but in extending the assault and battery , upping the dust resistance and stool a few tweaks to the audio , Marshall may well have succeed on its title .

Design

Visually , little has convert about the Emberton ’s appearance . It carries the same dimensions as before , remain the same exercising weight and features identical controls . Marshall appear to be a big believer in the “ if it ai n’t broke ” philosophy .

Where it disagree is that it ’s available in fewer colourways ; the Emberton II comes in a opprobrious and brass section close or cream . The gold styling on the black and brass model gives the Marshall logo a snazzier look .

The silicone coating encase the speaker system sports a texture that ’s designed to hearken back to a authoritative vinyl look . Dust / H2O - resistance has been upped fromIPX7to IP67 , with the Emberton II more resilient to dust and dirt .

The sequel stay on waterproof in that it can survive being dunked into a body of water that ’s 1 m mystifying for 30 minutes ( a very specific depth and amount of fourth dimension ) , although I ’m a small scattered about the claims of being waterproof when the USB - C burden port on the speaker system ’s side remain exposed .

There ’s no shoulder strap or hook for carrying , so the Emberton II is either going to travel in a bag or be extend alfresco . Like the original , it ’s easygoing to keep back in one bridge player and the build calibre is solid enough that it feels as if it could survive a few accidental drops . The speaker ’s sizing means it could be taken on holiday , just note its 700 g when meet those weight limitation .

Marshall has deigned to make any changes to the top surface . A push down on the multi - directional thickening turns the verbalizer on or off ; a jog plays / pauses audio . A squirm to the left or right omission tracks , and up and down adjusts volume . cerebrate of it like the D - pad on a games console restrainer and you ’ll be on the correct lead for understand how it feels to use – a flimsy click offers fulfill feedback when operating .

ABluetoothpairing push on the left - hand side and a stamp battery indicator on the right make up to the rest of the design touch . Another thing to remark is that the Marshall Emberton II is made from more sustainable materials than the original , utilising 50 % post - consumer recycle plastic from used electronics , with it 100 % free of PVC ( polyvinyl chloride ) charge card material .

So , on the outside at least , Marshall presents a speaker that ’s nigh the same as the original – and there ’s something to be say for screw what you ’ve get and sticking with it .

Features

barrage fire spirit has been widen here , although all Marshall will say is that it ’s more than 30 hours ( the archetype was 20 + ) . That ’s more than enough for several days of utilization before you ’ll involve to opine about plugging it in .

And when the time come to shoot down the Emberton II , there ’s fast - charge support – although , inquisitively , it is n’t as fast as the original . A 20 - minute bursting charge is only sound enough for four minute compared to the original ’s five . Charging back to full is equal to the original at three full hours .

Bluetooth wireless connectivity has been upped to v5.1 with Bluetooth range the same at 10m/30 ft . In terms of stability the Marshall is fine , but it gets a little shaky once I reached around , and retiring , the 10 m mark . In terms of volume , the speaker projects it sound well enough in my garden to be heard from the other end , but the JBL cathexis 5 is in effect at reaching loud volumes .

Like the original , the Emberton II feature Marshall ’s True Stereophonic speech sound for 360 - academic degree audio , and it works well enough when shifting the loudspeaker system around . From the side there ’s a slight drop off in tone of voice , but it is n’t too obvious .

New is support for mate ( as many as you wish ) Emberton II speaker unit with the Stack manner , as well as app reinforcement . In the app you may manage the Stack manner , check over battery life and tweak the sound with three EQ presets .

Marshall is the nonpayment option ; agitate boost freshwater bass and treble frequencies and Voice enhances the mid - range to lend surplus clarity to voice . Trying them with The Beatles ’ Hey Jude , Voice does n’t so much emphasise vocals as de - emphasise everything else , which in number makes vocals go less born . Push produces to a V - shaped sound signature , where vocals become a footling obscured in the soundstage .

Sound Quality

The original Emberton was a good - sounding speaker , a tranquil and up-and-coming wheeler dealer in Marshall ’s well - versed expressive style ; but it lacked a grade of clarity and mid - range detail . Although the Emberton II looks the same , features the same driver setup and amplification , it sounds like Marshall has retuned the speaker system to descend more clarity from the mid - reach upwards .

The differences range from subtle to fairly obvious , but they ’re there to be discovered if take heed to for long enough . The way the Emberton II organises the soundstage is different ; vocals are take a clearer caliber , project above the rest of the running , as if they ’ve been pinched and plank further out of harm ’s way .

More often than not , the Emberton II is right with vocal than the archetype . The mid - range and delivery of song sound recessed in comparison to its harbinger when listening to Talib Kweli ’s Hostile Gospel , Pt.1 – deport Us .

There ’s a slight difference in the tonality of treble bank bill ; they ’re a littler crisper and clearer in 1612 Underture ’s Another Witch is beat . While in GoGo Penguin ’s Raven , the difference is more obvious – increased limpidity and item offer greater insight into the top remainder of the frequency range .

Both in terms of rhythm and timing across the frequency range the sequel sound slenderly better , with the append clearness an improvement on the original model ’s smoothness . I ’m able to see more of the notes with expert , more clear-cut separation between the frequence rank .

Dynamism , the difference between muted and loud notes , look to be slightly meliorate too – the speaker sounds a little louder despite the same elaboration under the hood . When there ’s a need for more vigor and impact , though , the original wins out .

The shimmy in momentum in Beautiful from James Newton Howard ’s King Kong soundtrack res publica stronger on the original , though , as the Emberton II is a tad placid by comparison . And the same goes for bass voice . In That ’s My Bitch from Watch the toilet , there ’s more to note at the lower remnant of the frequency range ; the Emberton II ’s measured approach seems a injured party of its clear mid - range and treble performance .

It ’s a alteration that I can live with since it lead in a much clear and natural sound . For those who prefer their basso big and noticeable , the Marshall still has a decently weighty low - terminal , and the Push EQ scene adds some more profoundness . Its big , thicker and weightier than the similarly pricedSonos Roam ; but the Roam is the clearer and more neutral performer of the two when playing Christina Aguilera ’s Without You .

I do like the Emberton II ’s racy audio with that track , however . Plus it can go louder than the Roam , too , although at higher volumes the focus centres on Aguilera ’s vocals , leaving a deficit of particular where the instrument and the round are concerned . The Sonos concord everything together more tightly . I ’d favour to take heed to the Sonos for most genres of medicine , but the Emberton II is , I ’d say , a more fun listen .

Latest deals

Should you buy it?

The IP67 paygrade of the Emberton II betters the original , allowing this speaker to be used in many more scenario without fear of it being damaged .

The improvements are all solid reasons to purchase this verbalizer , but is there a pressing pauperization to get this new role model if you have the original ? I ’d say the Emberton II does n’t quite put the original in the shade .

Final Thoughts

The Emberton II ’s performance is appreciably better than the original : it ’s a clean-cut , detailed and more articulate - sounding wireless loudspeaker system . It retain the Marshall vibration of push and fun , but vocalize more mature ; it ’s a speaker whose tastes have grow up .

The fantastic visual aspect is the same as the original , but Marshall has extended electric battery life to class - leading levels and brought in app support , although the EQ options are n’t the greatest . Nevertheless , the Emberton II is another splendid portable utterer from Marshall – it ’s a charming , fun and full of life effort that improves on its highly reckon predecessor .

Trusted Score

How we test

We test every wireless speaker we brush up thoroughly over an extended period of meter . We use industry stock test to liken feature properly . We ’ll always tell you what we find . We never , ever , accept money to survey a product .

bump out more about how we test in ourethics policy .

FAQs

From a beat battery , it takes around three hours to fully charge the speaker unit .

Full Specs

Sustainability

Trusted Reviews ’ holds the fact that global warming is not a myth as a core note value and will continuously endeavour to help protect our planet from harm in its business practices .

As part of this mission , whenever we refresh a product we get off the company a serial of interrogative sentence to help oneself us gauge and make transparent the impact the twist has on the environment .

We currently have n’t received answers to the doubt on this intersection , but will update this Sir Frederick Handley Page the moment we do . you’re able to see a detailed crack-up of the questions we ask and why in oursustainability information Thomas Nelson Page .