Verdict
The Kingston Fury Renegade SSD is a phenomenal composition of kit . Despite its somewhat senior TLC , in real - world scenario it perfectly master in both raw transcript exam and plot loading times . It may be a PCIe 4.0 drive , but this might just be the best PS5 SSD out there right now . Both for time value and functioning .
Pros
Cons
Key Features
Introduction
Kingston ’s Fury Renegade SSD is utterly one of the very best PS5 SSDs on the market and very light to recommend .
Unlike most of its challenger , the troupe has used a more interesting combination of componentry on the PCIe 4.0 weapons platform to build up something unique .
Instead of just relying on the late PCIe 5.0 NAND in a 4.0 parcel like Crucial , or jumping ship toPCIe 5.0 , the Fury Renegade is an intriguing commixture of full - fat DDR4 , combined with Old 176 - Layer NAND , and Phison ’s PS5018 - E18 controller , with some killer microcode instead .
What does that mean ? Simply put , some unbelievable operation across both serial and random 4 K bod , that translates to serious real - world prowess . It might not be a PCIe 5.0 drive , but it does n’t hold any punches when you compare it to them .
Specs
Predominantly Kingston ’s Fury Renegade has been plan with one intent in mind , to be installed in a PlayStation 5 . It ’s a PCIe 4.0 unit , matching the PS5 ’s M.2 slot , and also features a strong low - visibility aluminium heatsink , to help encourage those redundant temps to fall .
What ’s really interesting however is that mix of hardware , and how that relates to literal - world performance . On the surface , if you were to look at what Kingston has included here ; four year old , 176 - Layer TLC , high - powered less efficient DDR4 cache , and a Phison PS5018 - E18 controller ( a 32 - bit ARM Cortex R5 build off the back of TSMC ’s 12 nm unconscious process ) , you ’d strike that it ’s going to perform perhaps as well as Crucial ’s P5 Plus , or Western Digital ’s SN580 . fundamentally , a budget parkway , seek to place itself as a perfect time value root for upgrading your console ’s storage .
But the thing is it does n’t , what Kingston has accomplish here , is just incredible , as it straight off challenges some of the fastest and most expensive PCIe 5.0 cause presently useable for purchase . Although more on that later .
Full Specs
away from odd computer hardware jazz band , and low visibility heatsinks , the Kingston Fury Renegade also features some impressive warrantee and endurance ratings , with the drive rated for up to 2000 TBW ( TeraBytes written ) on endurance alone , of course it come with the now standard 5 - year warranty too .
There are no data convalescence service like you ’d find with something like Seagate ’s FireCuda 540 or similar , but it ’s still a good 600 TBW more than its closest competitors .
Test Setup
When it come to testing any amount ofSSDs , the first place you necessitate to start is with a good substantial stable trial bench or test PC .
I ’ve been test the Kingston Fury Renegade and a number of its competitors over the last few weeks and knew from the outset I ’d require some top - tier hardware to ensure the only constriction was the parkway itself .
Each SSD is try out in the PCIe 5.0 slot , closest to the CPU , on an Asus ROG Z790 Dark Hero motherboard . I ’ve also geminate that with anIntel Core i7 - 14700Kto ensure filing cabinet transportation rest politic and consistent and that there ’s more than enough cores to go around . All drives are removed from their heatsinks and set underneath the let in M.2 aluminium heatsink on the plank itself to secure a level playacting field .
you’re able to regain the full system spec below :
When it occur to deciding on what tests to use during my time benchmarking these drives , I opted for a commixture of synthetic and real - world benchmarks . Crystal Disk Mark 8 is our test of selection for pure synthetic resolution , reckon very specifically at Sequential fastness at a queue depth of 8 and 1 , and then Random 4 K speeds at Q32 and Q1 as well .
The former is more useful to understand how these drive perform in rapidly copy and retrieving standardised file type , whereas Random 4 K is more revelatory of game shipment , or transport leftover file sets . PC Mark 10 ’s Quick System Drive and Data Drive benchmark have also been admit , so we can see exactly how each drive performs overall on an index basis too .
For our real - world exam , we ’re taking vantage of Final Fantasy XIV ’s 4 K game benchmark test . you’re able to invest it right away onto the campaign itself , and then load it from the drive . When terminated it ’ll give you an middling cargo meter in seconds for all scene . Finally , I ’ve also admit a 120 GB file written matter examination , whereby we take a copy of Red Dead Redemption II ( 119 GB technically ) , copy it onto the thrust , and then time how long it takes to create a second transcript on the movement itself .
I ’ve also included several index , created by dividing the cost in USD by various metric include max sequential and 4 K speed , along with a GB per $ metrical , to give us a proficient savvy of how these drives execute from a pure note value position at time of authorship .
Performance
Let ’s not beat around the crotch hair here , Kingston ’s Fury Renegade , is seriously telling when it come to benchmark performance .
Sequentials file at 7,002 MB / s and 6,627 megabyte / s respectively . Compared to the of the essence T500 ( featuring 232 - Layer TLC NAND plus Phison ’s E25 controller ) , it was 106 Bachelor of Medicine / s slower on read , yet nearly 400 MB / s quicker on the writes alone .
Keep scroll down the results and random 4 K pin grass in at 89 and 354 MB / s , compared to the T500 ’s 94 and 326 MB / s , again slower on read but quicker on write .
What ’s more interesting however is have a flavour at the 4 K Q32 results . Although admittedly a reasonably niche scenario , the Fury puzzle every undivided drive we have on exam , by some margin , even the top - tier PCIe 5.0 movement .
Into the real - earth results , and those synthetical figures really start out to show where exactly the performance on this drive lies . Final Fantasy XIV managed an impressive loading meter of 7.69 , slightly slower than the T500 , T700 , and Aorus Gen5 , but still more than respectable .
The big impact however come in the conformation of the 120 GB Indian file copy trial , where the Fury skid in with a 36.51 second copy sentence , again quicker than any campaign I ’ve quiz , including the Aorus Gen5 12000 .
Latest deals
Should you buy it?
Kingston ’s Fury Renegade 2 TB might be pricier than most PCIe 4.0 drive , but it makes up for it in raw real - world operation , game load time and file transfers are phenomenally quick , and its successive speeds are not just tough either .
Sequentials are still on the slow side comparatively . Although they ’re not bad for PCIe 4.0 , you ’ll really benefit from picking up a faster PCIe 5.0 drive instead , such as Crucial ’s T700 , or Gigabyte ’s Aorus Gen5 12000 ( if you may regain one in stock ) .
Final Thoughts
Kingston ’s Fury Renegade is an impressively well - round private road , delivering some epic performance . Combine that with a whole low - profile heatsink , and not only is it well suited to thePS5that it was designed for , but any gambling microcomputer out there too .
It might just be one of thebest SSDs around . Kingston ’s build something alone with this ride and shown that there ’s alternative ways to drive performance , perhaps in more meaningful path outside of pure sequent numbers alone . The Fury ’s secretive competition is by farCrucial ’s T500 . Similarly priced with similar performance , but what the Fury lacks in value it urinate up for in endurance .
Trusted Score
How we test
Each SSD we test utilise a mixture of both celluloid and existent - world benchmark mental testing . On top of that , we also employ a issue of price - to - performance metric , and monitor temperature and king - draw to shape the foresighted - term stability and monetary value - effectiveness of the driving force .
FAQs
Yes , the Kingston Fury Renegade is specifically designed for installing into the Playstation 5 ’s M.2 expansion slot .
No , the Kingston Fury Renegade is based on the PCIe 4.0 connective standard .
