TheIntel Core i7 - 14700kandAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3Dare the later mid - range processors from the big chip Lord , offer a great counterbalance between king and price . But which is the best option for your money ?

We ’ve reviewed both desktop processors , set up us in a great office to assess their strengths and weaknesses . We ’ve collect blanket bench mark data for both chips , giving us a clear picture of how they compare .

Keep on meter reading for a full crack-up of the two desktop processors , as we hollow deeper into the pricing , eyeglasses and performance .

Price and availability

The Intel Core i7 - 14700k launched back in October 2023 with a Mary Leontyne Price of $ 409 . That ’s really slimly gaudy than its predecessor , the i7 - 13700k , which go far in shops with a price of $ 419 .

Meanwhile , the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D set in motion in April 2023 , make it a more or less older chip . AMD priced the chip at $ 449 , although we have noticed it to be even gimcrack at prize retailers .

Specs

The Intel Core i7 - 14700k and AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D are targeting the same mid - range marketplace , as shown by their similar toll points . And yet , if you look at the specs , there seems to be a big disparity .

The AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D features 8 inwardness and 16 threads , which reckon decent in closing off , but the Intel Core i7 - 14700k sport 20 core and 28 threads .

This does n’t paint the whole painting though . Intel has adopted a hybrid design for this multiplication of processor , which think of it ’s using a blend of eight operation Congress of Racial Equality ( up to 5.5GHz ) and twelve effective Congress of Racial Equality ( up to 4.3 gigacycle per second ) . This differs greatly to the AMD chip , as all of its cores are made equal and are capable of reaching the 5GHz superlative .

Rather than adopting a hybrid conception , AMD has another ace up its sleeve . It ’s using its own3D V - Cachetechnology , which increases the amount of potential cache the chip can access and , theoretically , turbo hike gambling performance .

It ’s a genius idea , although it does n’t always have the desire effect . Only select games will in reality benefit from this public presentation boost , limiting its appeal . Nevertheless , this raise the gaming carrying out ceiling the chip is subject of .

Performance

The Intel Core i7 - 14700k scores a clean sweep when comparing the two Saratoga chip in our processing powerfulness bench mark results .

Thanks to the higher boost clock speed , Intel slip the sharpness over AMD in all of our single - core synthetic test . The interruption was even larger for multi - core performance , with the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D achieving a 17,938 final result in the Cinebench R23 Multi - Core run , whereas the Intel Core i7 - 14700k make a mighty telling 31,928 .

These final result point that the Intel chip will be far speedy when it comes to multi - threaded workloads such as effigy processing and rendering animation , and so is very important for originative professionals .

But what about gaming ? It ’s a similar news report , with Intel slip a big reward for every single plot we had on test , which we expected due to the high clock speeding .

Of of course , AMD ’s 3D V - Cache technology makes this a little more complex , as any game that benefit from the engineering science should see a big carrying into action boost . But it ’s difficult to establish which game will actually see a difference – none of the game we had no test seemed to be sham .

Power consumption and temperature

So we ’ve ground that the Intel Core i7 - 14700k is the more potent crisp of the two , but that does number at a cost – specifically for your get-up-and-go poster .

The Intel Core i7 - 14700k draw a destiny of power , both idle and under pressure . With the Intel chip install , our microcomputer saw an unwarranted index ingestion of 172.3W , whereas trade it for the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D check that figure plummet to a128.5W.

The peak mogul consumption divergence was even more noteworthy . With the AMD our microcomputer draw 465.3W , while switching the Intel fleck saw that number bound up to 616.5W. That ’s a big difference , to such an extent that you may need to be mindful about upgrading your PSU .

We also screen the caloric carrying into action of both chips , and found the AMD Ryzen to be just over 10 ° vitamin C cooler than Intel when the PC was idle , but then 3 ° ascorbic acid hotter than Intel when running an intensive bench mark . With either chip , you ’re going to need a decent cooling organisation .

Verdict

Our benchmark results show it to be slamdunk for theIntel Core i7 - 14700kwhen it comes to performance , whatever the workload . Intel especially realize a great lead for multi - core carrying into action , but gaming results were systematically higher-ranking to AMD too – all despite the Intel having a lower RRP .

That ’s not to say there ’s no reason to purchase theAMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D. It ’s still capable of great performance , all while have well less power than the Intel . If you ’re worried about your energy notice , and do n’t fancy raise your PSU , then it ’s still a great option . Plus the groundbreaking 3D V - Cache may well give you a surprising operation advantage over Intel for select games – it ’s just hard to know which games they are .

insure out ourBest CPUandBest gambling CPUguides for even more choice .