Verdict
The Intel Core i7 - 14700 K pack in more hardware at the same price as the 13th edition . It ’s not quite i9 performance just yet , but it ’s faithful . And at this cost point , it ’s a fantastic time value proposition for any needing a CPU that can dominate both in - game and in any professional task you throw at it .
Pros
Cons
Key Features
Introduction
The Intel Core i7 - 14700 K is perhaps the most interesting central processor out of Team Blue ’s 14th generation of CPUs .
It features all of that same Raptor Lake architecture goodness that its siblings have pushed to the absolute demarcation line , but unlike theCore i5 - 14600Kand thei9 - 14900 K , it in reality has extra internal hardware , alongside bumped up clock speeds , and a few neat trick to give it an edge in the marketplace .
For the longest time , the Core i7 was the flagship processor in each Intel coevals , however with the arrival of the Core i9 , in no small part a response to AMD ’s success with Ryzen , it fall by the roadside . Now , with the addition of even more effective - core group compared to its 13th - coevals opposite number , the line between the Core i7 and the i9 is embark on to obnubilate .
You do n’t quite have all the same features however , there ’s noAPO smart resource managementthat you ’ll find on the Core i9 , and the clock speeds are much low here , but when it come to naked public presentation between the two , it ’s a lot unaired than you might think .
Specs
Unlike its other fourteenth - generation family , the Intel Core i7 - 14700 K packs in extra ironware into its overall design . As criterion , it packs in 12 Gracemont effective - centre , each with a single thread , and eight Raptor Cove performance - pith , complete with hyperthreading .
What you ’re left with is a 20 - heart central processor , with a total of 28 threads , each intelligently allocated by Windows dependent on whether the program demands the highclock speedsand multi - threaded performance of those Raptor Cove functioning core , or more efficiency - optimised artistry of the Gracemont cores or else .
Full Specs
relatively , the Intel Core i7 - 13700 K only featured eight efficient - cores , although it still featured the same eight performance - cores we see here . On top of that the 14700 K also boast in high spirits clock speed , clock in at a max turbo of 5.6 Gc versus the 13700 K ’s 5.4 GHz on its top - firing cores . That ’s not a huge difference ( 3.84 % excrescence ) , but it does go to some substantial performance difference when amplified across all eight of those performance essence . The 14700 K also comes with 3 MB of extra smartcache ( a 10 % bump ) as well .
Otherwise , the two potato chip remain fairly identical , with the same graphics , TDP , and unusually , pricing too . Where it gets a bit squashy is in equivalence to the Core i9 - 14900 K with Intel ’s top - tier flagship , at a hardware grade , featuring only 4 extra effective - cores and 3 MB of extra cache . The major difference here is the clock speed , where the 14900 K can top out at a whopping 6 GHz with TVB ( Thermal Velocity Boost ) , or 5.8 GHz naturally . Still , not a band when you view there ’s a $ 180 price difference between the two .
Test Setup
To really put the Intel Core i7 - 14700 K through its paces , I ’ve spent the last few week hammering it through some of the toughest benchmark suites around . Covering everything from 1080p gaming , to 4 K rendering , power monitoring , temperature strain examination , and everything in between . I ’ve also tested every other major CPU in the 14th and thirteenth coevals Intel line - ups , and some of its AMD rival as well , to give us a clean looking at at just how on the button it performs under load .
For my mental testing seam , I ’ve used the below parts , with a tonic Windows 11 install , with thelatest BIOSand chipset update wherever potential . It ’s important to keep the trial run - bed consistent across political platform for easy comparisons during the benchmarking process .
For gaming , I ’ve used a turn of titles , includingHorizon Zero Dawn , Dirt Rally , Borderlands 3 , Total War : Warhammer III , Cyberpunk 2077 , and a few others as well . This gives us a antic ambit of title with all form of load and optimisation . Some favor individual - essence performance , some take advantage of multi - core scenarios . All have been tested at 1080p as this is where you ’re most likely to see a CPU chokepoint , particularly at high frame rates .
As for the synthetic side of things , Cinebench R23 , GeekBench 6.2.1 , PC Mark 10 , and 3DMark are the name of the secret plan . I ’m also utilising a index meter , and HWMonitor to keep an eye on temporary worker and draws , throughout the process as well .
Performance
When it came to my sentence testing the Intel Core i7 - 14700 K , I was enjoyably surprised with just how well - balanced it was as a mainframe . I did have some initial trouble , specially with memory timings on our Z790 add-in , but after a piece of XMP tweak that was break up . The computer storage comptroller on this particular 14700 K sample is n’t quite as stable as with the Core i5 - 14600 K or 14900K.
Memory wobbles aside , for the price , the 14700 K is incredibly well balanced , with imposingly eminent single - gist performance , particularly in the likes of Cinebench and Geekbench where it mark 2,039 and 2,836 severally . That is somewhat behind the likes of the 13900 K ( 2,147 / 3,082 ) and the 14900 K ( 2,214 / 3,123 ) , by around 8 - 10 % or so , but give this thing is 29 % cheaper than the two of those , I ’m happy to countenance that lantern slide .
That difference does however expand in the multi - core section respectively . But a warm glance at Cinebench and some fairly bare math , still puts the difference , at most between the Core i9 and the Core i7 at just 12.4 % , that ’s a astounding morsel of affordability right there .
play is where the Core i7 really shines however . Across our entire examination suite average frame - rates sit down at 212 fps , compared to the Core i9 ’s 219 , and theAMD Ryzen 9 7900X ’s 194 . hacker managed an impressive 218 fps at 1080p , and Total War : Warhammer III nabbed itself a sweet 193 fps on mean , less than 1 % difference between itself and its more expensive bigger buddy .
It is however deserving observe that the 14700 K is a hot central processing unit . Seriously red-hot . Under loading it regularly tap out our emphasis - test at 100 C. Admittedly it managed this and stay stable , but to really get the most out of those corroborate high - end performance - core clock speeds , you ’re buy the farm to require one of thebest CPU coolersyou can get .
I extremely commend a 360 millimeter AIO at a minimum . You could apply something pocket-size , but you will be sacrificing performance if you do so . Likewise , a good top executive supply is critical here too . Under load , our 14700 K drew 616.5 W from the wall , only 7W shy from what the 14900 K drew , and a astonishing 134.7W more than what the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X oversee .
If you could get past the hot temporary worker and high-pitched power draw though , there ’s no denying that the Intel Core i7 - 14700 K is a seriously attractive fiddling number . On fair , there ’s a 10 % performance departure between it and the 14900 K in my testing , and in - game that drops to around 3 % at 1080p . Combine that with the huge price gulf between them , and it ’s prosperous to see why this is such an attractive pick . Ok , you do lose out on things like thermal velocity hike , and Intel ’s APO ( practical app optimization ) tech , but we ’re still waiting for the latter to really take off , and the former is somewhat much handled mostly by top - tier motherboards anyway .
Latest deals
Should you buy it?
It ’s without a doubt the best - economic value computational microprocessor chip . For the price , you get an incredible rendering motorcar that can hold its own in play , and more .
It might be closing in on theCore i9 - 14900 K , but there ’s still a fairly sizable performance delta between the two chip . The Core i9 - 14900 K beats out the 14700 K by around 10 % in examination , and comes with some potentially radical characteristic in the form of APO and TVB .
Final Thoughts
The Intel Core i7 - 14700 K is the ultimate value proposition . It ’s improbably well balanced and is only 10 % behind the 14900 green in terms of computational performance , and 3 % behind it in - secret plan .
Its close AMD competitor , theRyzen 9 7900X , can match it on a computational point , but does n’t quite have the same gambling art , and the14900Kis just too expensive in comparison . It ’s one ofthe best CPUsout there right now , and well deserving a look .
Trusted Score
How we test
When reviewing processor it ’s significant to keep your test - bed as monovular as potential across platforms . We try out a phone number of chipping for each generation launch , using similar or monovular component wherever we can .
As for the tests , we use a commixture of both in - biz benchmarks and synthetic tools to determine overall carrying into action , and also study additional features , RRP pricing and alternative use - case scenarios to accurately score each mainframe .
FAQs
The Intel Core i7 - 14700 K support both RAM eyeglasses , however it will vary depending on your motherboard . Make certain you corrupt the right kit of RAM for your motherboard , and vice - versa .
No , only the Core i9 - 14900 K supports this feature at this meter .
Test Data
