Verdict
The Intel Arc A770 is a flakey graphics card . Compared to its small sibling , the A750 , it just does n’t quite put up the performance you ’d expect , peculiarly give the much heftier toll tag . There are hearty frame rate at 1080p and 1440p and that 16 GB of VRAM does go a long way but it ca n’t keep up with rivals .
Pros
Cons
Key Features
Introduction
The Intel Arc A770 is Team Blue ’s first flagship graphics poster it has ever launched . It takes a peck to get into the GPU industry and a vast amount of investment to fetch a product to securities industry that can challenge the already well - set up mark of both AMD and Nvidia .
For Intel , it ’s forbear from run all out , building monumental flagships open of demolishing 4 KB gaming at a whim , and instead opted to target 1440p as its resolution of selection . That ’s quite an intelligent move , given the majority of gamers are still using monitor lizard in the 1080p and 1440p range , at least agree to the later Steam hardware surveys . That ’s not on the button a bad thing either , given how manyfantastic gaming monitorsthere are usable flop now .
Still , it does make theIntel ArcA770 , a little more underwhelming than the likes of Nvidia ’s recently releasedRTX 4080 Super , or AMD’sRX 7800 XT . No , this is a card with a very specific fair game in brain , however , unlike its A750 sibling , this one might have hit one too many roadblocks on its way to greatness to make it shine .
Specs
At its heart , the A770 is built off of TSMC ’s N6 7 nm manufacturing process , compound with Intel ’s first GPU computer architecture in the form of Alchemist . It ’s ground off of a modular design , apply multiple chiplets to organize the GPU . That give Intel a substantial vantage , as it can stack as many chiplets ( or Xe inwardness ) as it wants together , to create its menu at any sizing it likes , as long as it can render the world power to it , and regulate temperatures as it does so . This also minimizes cost , as it ’s less complex than fabricate a unmarried monumental design like Nvidia does .
As for the core stats , the A770 features 32 Xe cores . Those come up with 4,096 shading cores ( think CUDA cores ) , 256 TMUs , 128 ROPs , and 32 “ ray trace unit ” . Similar to the XE Cores , the ray tracing unit are comprised of a number of separate component , in this case with the 32 you get 1,024 tensor cores , 512 execution of instrument units , and 8 render piece total .
Full Specs
Clock speeds are fairly high up there too , with a burden clock of 2100 MHz and a max boost clock of 2400 MHz . Interestingly , throughout my testing , the Arc A770 stuck resolutely to those figure . That ’s quite unique as most aftermarket menu with competing GPUs incline to clock much high than Nvidia or AMD ’s recommended max boost clocks .
The A770 is also available in two separateVRAMSKUs , 8 GiB and 16 GB . There ’s about a $ 20 price conflict between the two . That ’s rather unearthly , because well , why would you bribe the 8 GB one , that being the case ? What ’s less telling however is the overall price right . The A770 is available at $ 350 or thereabouts , which , given the performance it can dish out , is not ideal , and not a spell on something like the A750 , but more on that later .
Test Setup
Over the last two workweek , I ’ve heavily try the Intel Arc A770 GPU , alongside a number of its competitors . I ’ve crusade it to the limit , benchmarking it across several unlike scenario , include everything from some of the most tax AAA game out there to aggressive synthetical trial and everything in between . To do that , I ’ve built a fairly telling test bed , all based around the Core i9 - 14900 K , one ofthe best CPUsout there .
CPU : Intel Core i9 - 14900 super C
RAM:32 GB ( 2x16 GB ) Corsair Dominator Titanium @ 7200
Motherboard : ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Dark Hero
CPU Cooler : Corsair iCUE Link H150i LCD 360 mm AIO
Cooling:8x Corsair iCUE Link QX120 120 millimetre rooter
PSU:1200W Corsair RMx Shift 80 + Gold PSU
SSD:2 TB Gigabyte Aorus Gen5 12000 M.2 PCIe 5.0 SSD
Case : Geometric Future Model 8 Dharma
For our gaming tests , I ’m using a broad mix of titles , some includingray tracing(with DLSS and AI upscaling disabled ) , some on Vulkan , and others on DX12 as well . I ’ve also used three-D Mark ’s Fire Strike , Speedway , and Port Royal benchmark , alongside Blender ’s own incorporate benchmarks . This gives us a really good indicant of how these cards do in these environment .
In all of my examination , I utilize the Ultra or highest graphic preset wherever possible . That does admit Ray Tracing presets for the likes of Cyberpunk . This means we can easily repeat our examination , without introducing any undesirable variable , and also allows you at home to compare your own machines easy with our resultant here to get a rough musical theme of how your own GPU compares .
Performance and Benchmarks
So , gaming performance . Overall , in isolation , the A770 does perform well . At 1080p average frame across all title landed at 83.43 Federal Protective Service , at 1440p that drop to 61.57 fps , and at 4 K it floats around the 34.14 fps mark . Those are solid number , particularly give Cyberpunk 2077 really does deplume that norm down quite sharply , thanks to its performance - impacting ray trace combined with our selection to disable AI upscaling for our stock tests .
Interestingly , it ’s less AMD and Nvidia , that cause Intel ’s A770 problems , but more its own lower - specification sib , the A750 . In comparison , that score 74.14 , 54 , and 29 fps across those same resolution . That ’s a 14 % operation increase going from the A750 8 GB to the A770 16 GB across all three answer unite and averaged out . Now yes , that is still a ample start , sure as shooting , but the cost increase between those two cards is 67 % . That is what really brings the A770 down . In fact , in my testing , I bump the AMD RX 7600 actually work over the Arc A770 in 1080p average operation by 2 Federal Protective Service and recede by 3fps at 1440p , but it costs $ 80 less . That ’s a job .
Still , Red Dead Redemption II on its Ultra preset , make an impressive 44 Federal Protective Service at 4 kibibyte , Borderlands 3 remove 41 and Total War Warhammer 3 wield 28 fps as well , so there ’s some decent performance to be had at 4 KiB with this GPU .
Ray Tracing and Upscaling
I ’ve also lease the chance to put the Intel Arc A770 through a number of dissimilar ray of light trace and AI upscaling scenarios as well . To do this , I ’ve quiz it across four separate runs , in different configurations on three dissimilar title . Those form of address being , F1 2022 , Cyberpunk 2077 , and Shadow of the Tomb Raider .
These runs use a multitude of different combinations of options , with or without re trace , combining that with or without AI upscaling . I ’ve leaned into each brand ’s own respective AI upscaling tech for these tests ( XeSSfor Intel , DLSS for Nvidia , andFSR 2.0 for AMD ) wherever potential . However , it ’s worth note that XeSS and FSR 2.0 are open reference and are compatible with all GPUs , whereas DLSS is n’t . Additionally , some titles do n’t support XeSS ( F1 2022 ) , or FSR 2.0 ( Shadow of the Tomb Raider ) . All tests are performed at 4K.
With that said , the Arc A770 does particularly well here . Ray trace performance across Tomb Raider managed 30 Federal Protective Service , increasing to 44 with XeSS , and CyberPunk 2077 break all the way from an unplayable 10fps to 28 fps . The latter is likely as XeSS relieve some of the storage bandwidth pressures that Cyberpunk ’s texture station on the VRAM itself .
It ’s still not quite as herculean as Nvidia ’s now well - developed DLSS 3.0 , but a free boost in performance , with minimal drawback is no bad thing .
Power Consumption and Temperature
Similarly to the Intel Arc A750 , the A770 is incredibly power athirst , over the course of my metre benchmarking , entire system of rules power drawing card topped out at an impressive 657.1W. That ’s only 13W behind Asus ’s ROG Strix GamingRTX 4080 Super OCI test earlier this year . Idle power attractor was also importantly gamy , averaging 205.7W making it the athirst card we ’ve quiz here at Trusted this year .
Temperatures though , remained within unchanging parametric quantity , lead out at 89.0 C , like to theRTX 4070 Ti Super .
Latest deals
Should you buy it?
60fps at 1440p is wanton as pie for the Intel Arc A770 , combine that with Acer ’s BiFrost Predator design , and you ’ll have a super slickness quiet GPU that can repel even the up-to-the-minute games at 60 fps at WQHD .
deplorably , the A770 struggles in the note value department at its current price . If you ’re looking for a better note value selection the A750 is a far better wager , with a lot less investment , although its 8 GB of VRAM may trammel you later on .
Final Thoughts
Intel ’s Arc A770 is an interesting GPU . For its first debut onto the aspect , Intel really has done a salient business of breaking into an incredibly competitive market place . One that ’s very much dominated by the expectant two . However , the A770 just miss the performance necessary to absolve its $ 350 monetary value tag . It ’s certainly not one ofthe just GPUs you could chance , not at that price anyway .
If you ’re looking for power , and are keen to game at 1440p at high-pitched framing rates , or even 4 one thousand at 60 , then theRTX 4070 Superis the card to pick . If you ’re looking for a GPU that will do similarly , but for $ 100 less , than something like Intel ’s own Arc A750 or the AMD RX 7600 XT are far better picks .
Trusted Score
How we test
Each of the graphics cards we test is installed into a dedicated test - bed . After which point multiple different benchmarks are run to tenseness test the identity card , at a variety of different resolutions . We also supervise business leader tie and temperature throughout this procedure .
FAQs
It ’s not quite there for 4 K gaming just yet , in our testing it delivered on average around 34.14 Federal Protective Service across all of our benchmark
