Verdict
It might not be the immobile GPU out there by any measure , but the Intel Arc A750 delivers incredible value for the money . you may easy pick one of these up for a scummy price mightily now . Across all of our test suite , at 1080p , it goes way over 60 Federal Protective Service under some serious load .
Pros
Cons
Key Features
Introduction
Intel ’s Arc A750 is a phenomenal piece of applied science , and a fantastically low-priced graphics plug-in , idealistic for 1080p gaming . It ’s remarkable just how far Intel has follow in such a short clip systema skeletale , in what ’s arguably one of the most difficult computing segments to ruin into . Arc , at the depressed remainder , is nothing if not impressive .
Utilizing TSMC ’s N6 7 nm fabrication process , the GPUs boast a mixture of traditional rasterization hardware , running aboard , consecrated Ray Tracing and Tensor ironware . This massively helps leverage modern graphics proficiency , combined with AI advanced upscaling to deliver firm gaming public presentation across 1080p and 1440p .
Intel ’s initial batting order include three separate divisions of Arc GPUs , Arc 3 , Arc 5 , and Arc 7 . The two most interesting identity card of the luck , are the A750 , which I ’m reviewing here , ( initially priced at $ 289 ) , and the A770 , ( uncommitted in two variants , an 8 GB and 16 GB for $ 329 and $ 349 respectively ) .
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Specs
Unlike Nvidia and AMD , it ’s quite challenging to analyze these cards from a purely ironware or spec perspective , as there ’s no anterior propagation to liken it to , and the architecture is vastly different to the like of Team Red and Green . The cards entirely hold up and die based on their comparative functioning to the competition .
Intel ’s built out its Alchemist computer architecture to go as a modular chiplet excogitation , rather than a monolithic flair , standardized to how AMD builds its top - grade GPUs . This gives Intel a slight edge , as it allow them to efficaciously scale up the card to any size and performance variable they want , without increasing complexity by any huge margin outside of power and temperature demands . It also bring in it more cost - effectual , and easier to make up as well , which is incredibly authoritative , impart how expensive GPU R&D is .
At its mettle , the A750 boast 28 Xe cores , comprised of 3,584 shading cores , 192 texture mapping units , 112 ROPs , and 28 ray tracing units . Those shaft of light tracing units sport 896 Tensor core , 448 execution unit , and 7 render slices full , giving the A750 plenty of computer hardware for consecrate AI upscaling .
Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)
Full Specs
Intel also build the Arc Alchemist serial publication on the back of the PCIe 4.0 connection interface as standard , and the A750 boast 8 GB of GDDR6VRAMas well , all on a 256 - bit motorbus , delivering 512 gigabyte / s of full bandwidth . Considerably more bandwidth than the RX 7600 , or its XT cousin-german . That ’s perfect for 1080p in 2024 , but if you ’re looking to practice this card in a few long time time , or intend to secret plan at 1440p , that 8 GB of VRAM could finish up being a significant chokepoint .
It ’s the pricing that ’s the veridical king here though , as Intel ’s Arc A750 comes in at just shy of $ 210 at retail , making it one of the highest - performing low-priced graphics wag out there right now . Is this thebest artwork cardmoney can buy ? No , but it does n’t involve to be .
Test Setup
I ’ve pass the last couple of weeks test the Intel Arc A750 alongside a number of its competitors and opposite number , put it through its paces across a assortment of literal - world and synthetical benchmark . With that in mind , I had to build a well - air out and self-colored test bed to get the most out of it , bear in nous any likely bottlenecks . I took reward of one of thebest CPUsin the stage business to check that , the Core i9 - 14900K. you could retrieve the full test seam specs below .
CPU : Intel Core i9 - 14900 K
RAM:32 GB ( 2x16 GB ) Corsair Dominator Titanium @ 7200
Motherboard : ASUS ROG Maximus Z790 Dark Hero
CPU Cooler : Corsair iCUE Link H150i LCD 360 mm AIO
Cooling:8x Corsair iCUE Link QX120 120 millimetre fan
PSU:1200W Corsair RMx Shift 80 + Gold PSU
SSD:2 TB Gigabyte Aorus Gen5 12000 M.2 PCIe 5.0 SSD
Case : Geometric Future Model 8 Dharma
I ’ve grab a gross ton of top - tier up game and synthetic test to put the A750 to the psychometric test , including benchmarks such as 3D Mark ’s Fire Strike , Port Royal ( for Ray Tracing ) , and Speedway . I ’ve also essay these GPUs with Blender ’s integrate benchmark too , all while maintain a cracking center on tycoon attraction , and summit temperature throughout the benchmarking process .
For our real - world play tests , we ’ve become for a total of seven deed of conveyance here too , with standouts being Total War : Warhammer 3 , Cyberpunk 2077 ( with ray tracing enable , and AI upscaling disabled ) , along with Red Dead Redemption II and Borderlands 3 as well .
In most of our tests , I ’m using the Ultra or highest preset I can find to make the examination variable coherent across each run , however , in the titles that support ray tracing features ( cyber-terrorist and F1 2022 ) , I ’ve guarantee DLSS , IntelXeSS , AMDFSR 2.0or any shape of AI upscaling is incapacitate by default .
Performance and Benchmarks
Let ’s curve to the Salmon Portland Chase , at 1080p the A750 is a serious contender . It on a regular basis chugs away at 70 - 80 Federal Protective Service in almost all of our titles . There are a few exception to that , in particular hacker 2077 and F1 2022 , with the latter hitting just 62 fps , and the former , 25 . But both those games feature fairly aggressiveray tracinggraphics options as criterion , and with AI upscaling disabled the hitting is gravely noticeable .
What ’s especially impressive about the Arc A750 is how it compare to the A770 . In testing it was regularly within 5 - 10 Federal Protective Service of its far more expensive bigger brother . There was n’t a whole quite a little in it , the A770 is certainly quicker certain , but not by much , and when you take into consideration the $ 140 price deviation between the two , and the 8 GB of extra VRAM the A770 has to its name , well it does leave you with questions .
One matter I would say , however , is that no matter what I tried , ( uncontaminating install , driver re - install , different CPU ) , 3D Mark ’s DX12 Speedway bench mark would crash on launch , now and again draw it 1 - 2 second into the benchmark before failing .
Ray Tracing and Upscaling
I also tested the Arc A750 across several dissimilar ray line form of address . This is purely a bit of a think exercise to see how Intel ’s XeSS compares against the likes of DLSS 3.0 and AMD ’s FSR 2.0 . In fact , at time of writing , Intel ’s just drop its XeSS 1.3 update as well , so numbers should improve here too .
All our ray trace ladder are fill in at 4 special K , in four different configuration , with or without ray tracing enabled , and that , mixed with or without Intel XeSS as well . That give us four solidification of different issue to sop up on , and a ton of data to pullulate over .
So , how did the A750 do in such a tax resolution ? Well unsurprisingly , without XeSS it struggled . Cyberpunk 2077 in particular is brutal , with the GPU scoring 2 Federal Protective Service on mediocre with ray tracing enabled , and XeSS disabled . mark that XeSS corner to yes though , and skeleton rates bounced up to 17 fps . Not that playable by any mean , but still an unbelievable 750 % jut in performance . This is probable due to XeSS alleviating a lot of the pressure from that 8 GB VRAM buffer storage , in a more “ normal ” scenario , Shadow of the Tomb Raider , went from 25 to 33 fps with light beam trace on , with a more hefty 35 % performance increase .
Power Consumption and Temperature
There ’s no denying , that the Arc A750 is a hungry card . Across our metre testing , the intact system take out , at most , 604.3W from the wall , and idled at 195.1W. That ’s on par with AMD ’s RX 7800 XT , a far more powerful bill of fare , that nabbed 184.8W and 606.5W severally , and is amazingly more than evenNvidia ’s RTX 4070 Super , at 172.3W and 589.3W too .
Temperatures however stay on well tamed throughout the benchmarking process , and bill GPU temporary worker never rifle above 84.0C. That ’s not the coolest we ’ve seen , again with theRTX 4080 Superfrom Asus staying well below that with a max temp of 74.5 C ( and that ’s on its hot spot , not the GPU , which hit just 65.0C ) but it ’s well within reasonable GPU temporary argument .
Latest deals
Should you buy it?
The Intel Arc A750 , no matter its nip , is an improbably impressive graphics card . Although its average frame rate do lack the impact of some of the lumbering hitter from the challenger , Intel ’s nail the pricing on the A750 by some margin , and per $ it ’s the respectable value GPU out there justly now .
8 GB of VRAM for 1080p gaming , is more than enough . That said , if you ’re expect to upgrade monitors in the future , or are project on gambling at 1440p with this matter , you might want to opt for something with a skin senses more VRAM or else , like the Arc A770 or AMD ’s RX 7600 XT .
Final Thoughts
The Intel Arc A750 tick off a curious first launching from Intel but the positive results talk for themselves . It ’s not by a top - level lineup , and its MSRP be that . It ’s had significant price cut since its launch and is now uncommitted at such a low price , that ’s made it a phenomenally tantalizing 1080p proposition that is jell to fulfil out the budget position in ourbest graphics cardguide .
The 8 GB VRAM is a little modification however , so if you do plan on play at 1440p , just live that later down the lineage , you ’ll plausibly need something with a spot more VRAM and a bit more power . Nvidia ’s GeForce RTX 4070 Super , and AMD ’s RX 7800 XT are fantastic pick in that regard .
Still , for a first attack , the Arc A750 is impressive , and although Acer ’s cooler lacks the esthetic style of some of the competitor out there , its unparalleled cooler plan keeps the visiting card well - chill and sensibly tranquil disregardless of what you bedevil at it .
Trusted Score
How we test
Each of the graphics cards we test is installed into a consecrated test bed . After which , multiple dissimilar bench mark are run to stress screen the bill of fare , at a variety of unlike resolutions . We also monitor world power draw and temperature throughout this procedure .
FAQs
Yes , the Intel Arc A750 performs fabulously well averaging 74.14 fps across our entire test suite . At this price peak it ’s a really strong competition .
Test Data
