Verdict

A fantastic choice to the DJI Mic 2 and similar compact wireless mic setup , the Hollyland Lark Max benefits from firm all - round performance , unsubdivided mathematical process and clever design – all at an attractive damage .

Pros

Cons

Key Features

Introduction

Like the recently releasedDJI Mic 2 , the Hollyland Lark Max is a succinct and lightweight omnidirectional wireless microphone designed for enter voiceovers , vlogs or interview in high character in almost any situation – indoors or out .

Hollyland impressed with its smartphone - focussedLark C1 , but the Lark Max work with a wider variety of products . you may link up it to your smartphone or tablet , yes , but it ’s also able-bodied to slot into a tv camera ’s red-hot skid , hook up to a computer via USB or operate altogether solo thanks to its built - in store .

Like the DJI Mic 2 , the Hollyland Lark Max is uncommitted with its own charging example and feature racket - cancellation engineering science , but a quick glimpse at the full features list reveals that it does n’t quite match up to it in terms of on - composition appeal . With a more affordable request price , however , could it be a desirable alternative for God Almighty on a miserly budget ?   Here are my thought .

Hand holding Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone transmitter.

Design

The Hollyland Lark Max pass receiver and sender can be purchase on their own , but I imagine the good pick is the packet featuring one RX telephone receiver , two TX transmitters , a charging type ( able to hold all three of the above ) and a sturdy comport bag ( inside which you ’ll also find two windshields for the transmitters and four cable system : 3.5 mm to 3.5mm , USB - Cto Lightning , USB - C to USB - C and USB - carbon to USB - A ) .

That ’s basically everything you ’ll ever need to utilize and charge the organisation while you ’re out and about , all fit into a single rugged and water - resistant bag .

The TX building block is small and lightweight ( just 33 g , which is only 5 gramme more than the DJI Mic 2 ) and can be attached to clothing via a snip or attractive feature . Once fixed , I could barely palpate it at all , and it never felt likely to fall off either . The furry windscreen slip onto the top , but only equip securely one style , so it give to insure it ’s steadfastly on before walking around . It come with a single 3.5 mm audio recording input for join an optional lavalier mic .

Hand holding Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone transmitter.

The RX whole consider around 60 universal gravitational constant and is a little larger , although still tiny enough to go in a little pocket . It also comes with a clip , which doubles as a mount for tie it to a photographic camera ’s hot horseshoe . Unfortunately , it only conform to into the hot shoe one way ( facing towards the back of the camera ) ; the DJI Mic 2 ’s RX fits in both way , and I would have preferred the Lark Max to do the same , as sometimes you ’ll be in front of the photographic camera filming yourself and it ’d be ready to hand to see the 1.1 - inchOLEDand approach the controls in these situations .

For connectivity , you get USB - coulomb ( for connect to a mobile equipment or computer ) , a 3.5 mm TRS yield ( for cameras ) and a 3.5 millimeter headphone input should you desire to monitor audio levels hold up .

control are simple on both the RX and TX , with the former benefit from both a touchscreen and a pressable telephone dial . you may apply one , the other or both when changing configurations , and having the choice is handy if you ’re break gloves or the screen is wet from rain .

Hand holding Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone transmitter.

Overall build caliber of all the elements is unanimous , although not quite up to the sturdy criterion set by the DJI Mic 2 . There ’s a lilliputian bit more creaking and flex here , but nothing I was unduly implicated by .

Features

The Lark Max ’s TX can engage to the full severally of the RX , thanks to its 8 GB of built - in storage : just hit the record release and it ’ll capture up to 14 hour of audio in the same lossless quality as regular mathematical process .

you’re able to also turn the noise cancelling on / off by strike another button , with the colour of the Christ Within bespeak the current state . It ’s a handy feature of speech if you want to travel as light as possible , although it would have been overnice to have the choice to also record at once wirelessly to a fluid gimmick via Bluetooth ( something you ’ll find on the DJI Mic 2 ) .

The contagion range , however , matches the Mic 2 ’s : up to 250 meter in ideal conditions . In reality you ’re probably never going to require that distance , and my trial run recording at home while walk from trading floor to flooring suggest that solid obstruction like walls and flooring stimulate the range to drop off to just a few metres before interference can be take heed – or the signal burn out wholly – in the recordings ( the same go on with the Mic 2 ) . Just be naturalistic in your expectations here to avoid disappointment .

Hand holding Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone transmitter.

One affair that does n’t disappoint is battery life . The built - in batteries on the TX and RX last for around 7.5 hours and 9 hours respectively , and with on - the - move reload good manners of the charging case , you’re able to achieve as much as 22 hour of constant usance . That really beat the DJI Mic 2 by four hours .

Audio quality

The Hollyand Lark Max offer up a very interchangeable recording experience to the original DJI Mic , offering high-pitched - calibre 24 - bit/48kHz speech sound , plunk up in an omnidirectional practice . With the RX attached to myPanasonic GH6camera and the TX clipped to my shirt about four in from my Kuki-Chin , I originally found the transcription amplification too high , leading to results that were far too loud . After consulting the user guide , I set my camera ’s record gain to moo and the resulting sound was much more comfy .

Audio quality is excellent : clean , accurate and not too affected by the wind when using the supply furred buckler . You might get cleaner sound from a shotgun or USB mic , yes , but throw the plug - and - play widget of this frame-up its result are impressive . You could sure as shooting practice the recordings for podcasts and similar “ professional ” applications .

There are three main recording modes : Mono , Stereo ( which need you to use two TX unit at once ) and Safety path , which employ a second mic to immortalise the same track but at 6dB lower – ready to hand as a accompaniment if your levels terminate up blown out by an accidentally loud noise . Despite having a general reluctance to use monaural rather than stereo for recording , I bump it made the most signified for general ‘ walking around ’ audio as it only requires the one transmitter .

Hand holding Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone transmitter.

You also record using one of three EQ preferences : Hi - Fi ( the standard modality ) , Low Cut ( which cut out lower - end sounds ) and Vocal ( which enhances voices ) . Having tried all three I chance Hi - Fi exploit just all right and deliver the most natural - sounding results , but I ’m sure the others have their place in specific position .

last , a word about the environmental noise - call off tech : it works ! It ’s not the most dramatic of ENC mode , but in my test it did dilute down on the background signal audio without too impact outspoken audio . It can be easily switch on and off during a transcription too , both on the RX and TX social unit .

Latest deals

Should you buy it?

Currently around £ 70 brassy than the DJI Mic 2 , the Lark Max act a solid return for your cash while offer a alike level of performance .

TheDJI Mic 2 ’s specialist features like Bluetooth recording and 32 - bit float audio give it a more impressive feature set on paper .

Final Thoughts

The Hollyland Lark Max is a solid alternative to theDJI Mic 2 , even if it does n’t quite touch its characteristic bent ; it has a importantly lower cost and slightly just battery life , after all .

Its telling audio quality , overall ease of use and the convenience of its charge fount stand for it does n’t feel like a budget pick at all , so if you’re able to live without lineal Bluetooth recording and 32 - bit float sound ( and I suspect a enceinte many of you’re able to ) it ’s well deserving considering as an affordable , flexible and portable solution for vlogging , podcasting and like forms of content creation .

Trusted Score

How we test

During each mike review , we conduct a serial publication of recording trial that include taste audio during idealistic setting , with background disturbance lend oneself and in an outdoor mise en scene ( where possible ) , to give you the best idea of how each equipment execute in veridical - world use .

FAQs

The build - in batteries on the TX and RX last for around 7.5 hours and 9 hours respectively , while the charging display case provides 22 hour of constant use .

There is no Bluetooth lineal connection .

Full Specs

Hand holding Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone transmitter.

Hand holding the Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone.

Hand holding the Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone.

Hand holding the Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone.

Hand holding Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone transmitter.

Hand holding Hollyland Lark Max wireless microphone transmitter.