OPINION : Samsung take the charge when it came to the world of foldables , but the company seems to have grow complacent in the years since , so much so that competing foldables from the likes of Oppo , Honor , and Huawei outshine late entry in the Galaxy Z Fold collection .
While we did see a notable improvement in overall design from theGalaxy Z Fold 5to theGalaxy Z Fold 6 , it ’s still chunkier , heavy , and lower - specced than much of the book - style rival . If Samsung desire to keep on its foldaway crown for much longer , somethingneedsto variety with this class ’s Galaxy Z Fold 7 .
With that in head , and having used most of thebest foldableoptions around mighty now , here are five raise that I think the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 desperately require to remain competitive .
1. Slimmer design
The most obvious modification I ’d like to see from the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a slimmer , lighter intention . Samsung made with child advancement in this respect with the move from the 13.4mm - thick Galaxy Z Fold 5 to the 12.1mm - thickset Galaxy Z Fold 6 , but it ’s still thick than a regular candybar smartphone – and the competition has taken thing much further .
Just weeks after the Galaxy Z Fold 6 was disclose , Honor let out the competingHonor Magic V3 . It was dubbed the slender book - style foldable at the time , measuring 9.2 millimetre compact , a full 2.9 millimeter lean than the Z Fold 6 . It was also lighter , at 226 GiB compared to the Z Fold 6 ’s 239 gramme , in line with veritable smartphones .
While I call back that was already push the limits of what folding tech could achieve at this stage , Oppo said , “ curb my beer , ” and devote us theimpossibly lean Find N5 in former 2024 . Measuring 8.9 millimetre stocky folded and 4.2 millimetre blossom , the next barrier Oppo will have to overcome is the breadth of the USB - C port . That ’s hard to enfold my head around .
Seriously , it ’s an unbelievable feat of engine room thatlooks and feelsyearsahead of the Z Fold 6 .
It makes it all the more frustrating that Oppo decide against a proper worldwide release , alternatively betray it in China , Singapore and a few other area in Southeast Asia – but hey , there ’s always the Find N6 …
2. Reduction of display crease
Aside from the ecumenical heft of Samsung ’s script - mode foldables , the other big offender is the crease on the inner foldable screen .
Now I ’m not expect Samsung to entirely eradicate the crease – I imagine that ’s near - impossible given that , generally speak , thing that are fold up get creased – but the inclination in the screen is almost cavernous compare to the contest .
Again , Samsung began to address this with the Z Fold 6 , offering a shallow seam than its precursor , but it ’s still much more striking than what you ’ll find from foldables like the Honor Magic V3 , Oppo obtain N5 and even the two - year - oldOnePlus Open .
It ’s still present on those foldables , of course , but it ’s a much shallower crease that ’s both less obtrusive visually and when run your finger across the cover . I can only hope for a interchangeable experience from this year ’s Galaxy Z Fold 7 .
3. Better auxiliary cameras
The fact is , regular smartphone cameras are salutary than those on foldables . It has been that way of life since foldables were gestate , and I imagine it ’ll continue to be the case for quite some time , kick in that even phones have direction more place inside to accommodate larger , more complex camera system .
With that in mind , the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6 actually does a good job where the primary television camera is concerned .
It ’s not quite as feature - pack as theSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra , but with a 50MP f/1.8 primary camera backed by a 1/1.57 - inch sensor , it ’s in line with the competition . For extension , the Find N5 has a 50MP f/1.9 Chelydra serpentina with a 1/1.56 - inch sensing element , and the Magic V3 has a 50MP f/1.6 crystalline lens with a 1/1.56 - column inch sensor .
However , the gap set out to widen when it comes to the auxiliary rapid climb and ultrawide lense , with the competition offer up more complex , higher - res alternatives than Samsung ’s foldable .
While the Z Fold 6 offers a fairly basic 10MP 3x fixed telephotograph electron lens , much of the rivalry instead opts for the more ripe periscope lens technical school for beneficial zoom carrying out . Not only that , but they ’re gamy - res ; both the Magic V3 and Find N5 offer 50MP sensors with 3.5x and 3x zoom respectively , though both can be pushed beyond that .
A move to periscope rapid climb technical school would be a great beginning , though that would ideally be coupled with a gamy solving to allow for better digital soar carrying into action .
The ultrawide could also use some lovemaking . The 12MP fix - focus ultrawide on the Z Fold 6 looks a little introductory compared to the AF - enable 40MP alternative from Honor ’s ledger - style foldable .
4. A bigger battery
barrage fire life sentence is another area where the Z Fold 6 needs some TLC . While it can get you through about a full day , the contest is again making tread in this department .
It ’s mostly due to the adoption of the newersilicon - atomic number 6 battery technology , which allows for higher - denseness batteries in a slight form broker . This allows manufacturers to essentially summate larger stamp battery capacity without sacrificing space – a essential factor for foldables in particular .
With that in mind , it should make out as no surprise that the silicon - carbon - enable recover N5 and Magic V3 extend full-grown batteries at 5600mAh and 5150mAh , severally . Both of these are monumental increases on the 4400mAh Li - Po battery in the Z Fold 6 despite being slender and lighter than Samsung ’s folding .
Samsung really needs to leap on this bandwagon if its foldables are to continue to be competitive while still being comparatively slight .
5. A different form factor
This one ’s direction less likely , turn over Samsung has seemingly replicate down on the tall - and - thin design of its screening screen , even with a slightly wider Z Fold 6 , but I think Samsung needs to go further . It ’s still taller and narrow than a even smartphone blind , defecate content looking at cramped on the cover CRT screen – though I do admit it ’s squeamish to use one - handed as a issue .
Still , with its slenderly awkward design , it place upright alone compared to pretty much every other foldable on the market .
I ’d much rather Samsung conform to the norm in this aspect , offering a cover screen that more closely resembles a traditional smartphone . It ’s the undecomposed of both worlds : a regular smartphone experience on the covering and a big - cover experience within . Why Samsung continues with its improbable and minute option is beyond me .
