Verdict

The BenQ PD3225U is a solid productiveness monitoring equipment for pairing with Windows and macOS likewise with fantastic connectivity , detailed output and a groovy OSD . Its image can be slightly dim , while its contrast may not be as strong as the competitor , though .

Pros

Cons

Key Features

Introduction

The BenQ PD3225U aims to furnish a loud option to Apple ’s Studio Display while packing in an awful great deal of feature for Mac and Windows drug user likewise .

It ’s a bigger panel for newcomer at 32 - inch while being a 4 K 60Hz IPS screen that ’s design for productiveness and creative workloads , as opposed to gaming .

At £ 1099.99/$1099.99 , it is slightly more affordable but remains pricier when compared to other similarly - specced choices such as theSamsung M8 Smart Monitor ( 2023)andSamsung ViewFinity S9

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

I ’ve been try out the PD3225U for the last couple of weeks to see how well it stacks up against some rather ferocious competition and whether it ’s one of thebest 4 K monitors . Let ’s observe out .

Design

The PD3225U is a silken , New admonisher with a gorgeous grey form and minimum bezels to maximize sieve real estate . It ’s also especially sturdy and hefty , carrying an 8.2 kg weight with the base .

The board is very easy to put together , with a puppet - less construction plainly involving screw the Qaeda into the genuine instrument panel , and you ’re off to the races . This makes setup a doddle , and mean you could be up and feed with the PD3225U in a matter of instant .

The stand here also offers some upstanding adjustment , with up to 150 mm of height adjustment , as well as skillful background for pivot , tilt and swivel . It can also be shifted into a portrait predilection if you wanted to use this gore as a secondary screen , for case . It is also 100 mm x 100 mm VESA - compatible if you ’d favour it on your own stand , too .

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

You get a choice when it come to how to navigate the OSD , with either a simple joystick on the reverse of the PD3225U alongside some selector buttons , or an extra puck which plugs in and offers an well-to-do fashion of accessing the tortuous OSD .

Connectivity is a strong item with an array of ports present on the PD3225U across both the underside and on the right deal side for quick entree . You get a pair of HDMI 2.0 port , as well as a funny stateless person 1.4 for more ‘ standard ’ display choices , as well as two Thunderbolt 3 USB - degree Celsius interface , one with 85W of power delivery and DisplayPort Alternate Mode sustenance , and the other with 15W mogul delivery , while there is a USB - bacillus larboard for powering theKVMswitch . The side also has another USB - carbon larboard , a USB - A and a headphone jack .

Image Quality

On paper at least , the PD3225U should extend some noble-minded image caliber , coming with a 32 - in 4 K IPS Black screen that hopefully rivalsApple ’s Studio Display . In practice session however , BenQ ’s Studio Display rival shoot the mark in some country , but not in others .

color truth is expectedly excellent for a more pro - grade panel , with my tintometer measure perfect 100 % reportage of the mainstreamsRGBgamut , while highAdobe RGB(86 % ) andDCI - P3(94 % ) score are also reflective of this panel ’s ideal suitability for colour - sensitive workloads such as design and video editing .

Where this control board certainly falls short is with a much lower peak light than both Apple and Samsung ’s options . BenQ quote the PD3225U to have a peak brightness of 400 nit , although that is aid along by DisplayHDR400 support . My colorimeter measured a top of 200.9 nit , which makes it dim against the liquid ecstasy of Apple ’s Studio Display at 596.78 nit and Samsung ’s ViewFinity S9 with its 629.6 nits .

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

It ’s much the same with its black grade and contrast ratio , too . The 0.22 black tier result mean its IPS Black panel eccentric put up reasonable cryptical blacks , although it is bettered by panels that cost a lot less , and demonstrably by Apple and Samsung ’s own nominee . The 790:1 contrast proportion also fall behind the competition , too , while its 7700 K colour temperature can leave image a tad on the blue side .

Those numeral only secernate part of the narration , however . In real - world exercise , I was actually impressed with the PD3225U , especially in its M - Book fashion which matched my MacBook Pro ’s display magnificently , and even in spite of its lower peak smartness , it still got smart enough for daytime - to - day working for me , while a 4 K resolution ensured elaborate output that seem fantabulous across its 32 - inch screen size .

Software and Features

The PD3225U ’s on - screen display ( OSD ) is promiscuous to navigate with either the joystick on the back of the panel itself , or with the included puck . It also comes with some extensive options for exchange the color mode such as for sRGB , DCI - P3 and Rec.709 . There are also specific modes for check a MacBook ’s display with the M - Book mode and for utilization in a dark elbow room , with the Darkroom mode .

It also comes with an interesting Dual View feature , which splits the 32 - inch screen in half , and you’re able to then choose which colour mode for the 2d half of the blind . It appears this feature article is useful if you ’re working on different labor on either side of the screen , and you want even more flexibleness .

There is also a KVM switch for commodious shift between inputs , which is a handy extra , while having Thunderbolt 3 capability for plug away in a MacBook and letting it consign while outputting to the PD3225U was mighty useful .

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Built - in speakers seem to be becoming a bit of a rarity on monitors up and down the price ravel , but if you require them , the PD3225U does have some . They ’re of reasonable timbre , serving up solid detail and comely overall sound recording for sell with medicine and picture show . However , you are going to be much better off with a pair of external speakers or a solidification of earpiece .

Latest deals

Should you buy it?

The PD3225U come up with a wide kitchen stove of remark that make it ideal for use with both windows and macOS , admit two Thunderbolt 3 ports and a USB - A port .

The PD3225U falls short with its mediocre light cause images to lack some lick . The competition comes with higher luminance for even more vibrant yield .

Final Thoughts

BenQ ’s PD3225U is a satisfying alternative to Apple’sStudio Displayif you require a more affordable option with excellent color accuracy , stylish looks and plentiful connectivity . Its 4 K output is also detail across a larger 32 - in screen , while it ’s also easy to put together with a tool - less building and highly adjustable stand .

However , against both the Studio Display and theSamsung ViewFinity S9 , the PD3255U offers much lower luminosity and direct contrast , meaning displayed images can miss a minute of punch and reverberance . With this in brain , its Shirley Temple Black are n’t as deep , either . The general watch experience on offer here is still keen , but it ’s not quite as good .

We ’re also at the point where both the Studio Display and ViewFinity S9 can be had for around the same price as the PD3225U ’s retail monetary value , and you could quite frankly get more for less than this BenQ choice . It ’s a great panel , but is overshadowed by broadly speaking well competitor . For more pick , check out our list of thebest 4 K monitorswe’ve tested .

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Trusted Score

How we test

We habituate every monitor we test for at least a hebdomad . During that time , we ’ll insure it for rest of use and put it through its paces by using it for both everyday tasks and more medical specialist , color - sensitive work .

We also see its people of color and figure quality with a tintometer to screen its coverage and the show ’s quality .

FAQs

The BenQ PD3225U comes with a 4 K resolution across a larger 32 - inch screen .

Test Data

Full Specs

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Image  Credit (Trusted Reviews)