Verdict
An inexpensive twosome of workout earphones with a in force set and gratifying sound . They ’re not the most feature - packed pair of headphone you ’ll ever grease one’s palms but they offer in effect value for the cost .
Pros
Cons
Key Features
Introduction
We ’ve revel plenty of Boston - based audio firebrand Back Bay ’s headphones in the past – the products are simple but they ’re effective .
The Runner 40 abide by inthat lineagewith their overture . There ’s nothing complex about what they volunteer but they do so at an affordable cost . If you want to get on with your exercising , the Runner 40 is a very cheap way of doing so .
Design
The Runner 40 feature an over - ear crotchet design and I ascertain that comforter level are very good . The moldable stuff of the main chassis is smooth while the stabilizer has a rubbery quality to it , so there ’s been no ache either on the arch of my auricle or in the ear itself .
The character of innovation means that the Runner 40 stays affixed and does n’t fall off , but that does n’t mean that the fit does n’t get slack . I ’ve used these headphones for month now , and I tend to advertize them back inward to assist maintain the fit and seal . It ’s normal for headphones to get loose during exercise , but the Runner 40 do seem to move about a spot more than most . There ’s a selection of small to large ear - confidential information to find the best fit you’re able to .
Noise closing off is very good when the fit and seal are right , and in a gymnasium they could easy blank out out most sound around me . They ’re shop toIPX7 , which see that they are rainproof .
The Runner 40 make use of mite controls and I ca n’t say I ’m a self-aggrandising sports fan of them – at least not while moving . I can never quite site where to adjure and when I do I ’m not using enough force . It would be easier and more accurate if physical controls were employed a laJabra .
people of color are a option of dim , rose amber or a lilac color . The charge slip the headphones add up in is rather large but considering the over - pinna hook pattern that ’s not a surprisal ( I ’ve seen bigger cases ) , and within is a little cover that show the shelling life sentence of the case .
Features
speak of battery lifespan , the Back Bay Runner 40 claim to offer 30 hours in total , with the earphones capable to do six hours per charge . A one - hour drain at 50 % volume led to a 10 % drop in battery sprightliness , so I imagine you could easily get more than six hours per charge from these phone .
charge is through the USB - blow connector – there ’s no wireless charging financial support for this model . No tight - charging is mentioned either .
Wireless connectivity is Bluetooth 5.2 withSBCand AAC codec funding , and I ’ve had no problem with the connection over examination . There ’s no honorable mention of Bluetooth multi - item , so do n’t expect that feature to be available with the Runner 40 .
There ’s no app but you could adjust the EQ with Back Bay ’s freshwater bass modal value . It work like it has done on its other headphones in enhancing the low-spirited absolute frequency to give them more impact . That ’s it for the feature , the Runner 40 are a simple pair of workout earphone .
Sound Quality
In terms of their sound lineament the Runner 40 are a quiet and unmortgaged performer . I ’d say there ’s some affectionateness to how it go , so while the midrange is clear , it ’s not the most elaborated or defined .
However , voice are handled well with a politic sense of clarity in Jose Gonzalez ’s Heartbeats , and with the playing of his guitar there ’s a welcome common sense of dynamism as you’re able to hear the different notes being played .
The bass voice is full-bodied with solidity and good depth in Eminem ’s The Real Slim Shady , Bodyrock ’s Yeah Yeah , and Warren G ’s Regulate . highschool are n’t the shining but they are clearly relay in GoGo Penguin ’s wipe off by Sunlight .
There is more of an emphasis on bass with these earpiece , but I feel they strik a solid enough remainder across the frequency range . throw to the Bass mode does increase the size and deepness of the bass but not to the point where it begins to strangle other aspects of the racetrack too much , but certainly without the mode on there is more distance for other instruments to exist in a track .
Again , the Runner 40 are not the most defined in performance but the levels of item and definition they offer are fine for the money . The soundstage is extensive and solidly wide , and when medicine necessitate a step up , the Runner 40 can summon it .
The sound of the Runner 40 is enjoyable , especially if you wish a bit of a bassy backing to your medicine . It ’s a likeable performance and while you could piece some faults with it , for the money they issue forth across more as nitpicks .
Latest deals
Should you buy it?
In the UK you could buy them for £ 31 , which in my book makes them something of a steal .
Not everyone care the feel of in - earphones so if ivory or zephyr conductivity are more your flavour then theSivga S01are usable for about twice the price .
Final Thoughts
An inexpensive duet of exercising friendly earphones with good consolation levels and an pleasurable strait . The Back Bay Runner 40 proffer good levels of economic value if you ’re depend for a cheap pair of headphones for exercise .
There ’s nothing necessarily spectacular with these headphones , but that ’s not the gunpoint of them . They do a line of work simply and effectively , and if you ’re after a distich of fuss destitute headphones then you should consider these as a humble cost option .
Trusted Score
How we test
We test every headphones we review good over an lengthy period of time . We use industry received tests to compare features properly . We ’ll always tell you what we find . We never , ever , consent money to review a product .
Find out more about how we try in ourethics policy .
FAQs
There ’s no wireless charging supporting for this brace of phone .
