Verdict
Fast , with a very just OLED filmdom and a toll that undercuts the big originative names , the Acer is an ideal alternative – but be mindful of its shortcomings too .
Pros
Cons
Key Features
Introduction
As the name suggests , the Acer Swift X 16 OLED ( SFX16 - 61 GB ) taste to excel in two surface area : velocity and presentation , and with a high - end AMD CPU and OLED gore , it ab initio shanghai but it take more than that to convince creatives and power user in 2024 , specially when the laptop has several strong rivals .
TheHuawei MateBook D16 2024deploys a high - ending Intel Core i9 - 13900H central processor for a three - figure cost , and theAcer Swift Go 16hovers around $ 1000/£1000 for a Core i7 model .
In contrast , the Acer Swift X 16 OLED costs $ 1,599/£1,499 , with prices frequently dipping to $ 1,199/£1,199 in sales event . Even at the disregard Leontyne Price , this notebook needs to impress .
Design and keyboard
This is one field where form does n’t really cope with role . There ’s doubtless impressive tech inside the Swift , but you would n’t know that from the outside .
It ’s not horrifying , and the build tone is splendid , but it also does n’t do much to stand out . The aluminum body seem like a hundred other laptops , with its tapering edging , small covert bezels and flecked speaker grille .
If you require a insidious car , the Acer click the box , but the design does nothing to excite , and while the Swift is not bulky or with child , its 17.9 mm soundbox and 1.9 kg weighting mean it ’s a morsel large than its rivals .
Connectivity is reasonable . On the odd side , there are two USB - C 4 ports and a headphone jack , and on the right you ’ll discover two full - size USB 3.2 Gen 1 porthole , an HDMI turnout and a microSD one-armed bandit . Internally there’sWi - Fi 6Eand Bluetooth 5.2 .
Half - way down the left - manus side , there ’s a force connecter . While that positioning is nettle , it does intend you do n’t have to charge using one of the USB - C ports .
There are some other negative : AMD internals imply no Thunderbolt , and while the office button includes a fingerprint lecturer there ’s no biometric choice on the 1080p webcam . The speakers are hunky-dory but a flake unruffled and cheesy , and only suitable for free-and-easy situations .
The Acer Swift does have Thunderbolt and is equal elsewhere , but one of thoseUSB - C portsis needed for charging . The Huawei falls behind with only one USB - speed of light embrasure , a slower USB 2.0 connection and no card expansion slot .
The keyboard has a numberpad , whitened backlight and sizeable keystone . It ’s quiet , consistent and comfortable , too . With that said , its typing military action is diffused and a bit spongelike , so anyone who yearns for the crisper typewriting of a Dell XPS or Apple MacBook wo n’t be sated .
The trackpad meanwhile is vast , precise and supports gestures , so no issues there .
Screen
If the design fade into the backcloth , then the display does the antonym . The 3200 x 1600 resolve means pin - sharp mental imagery , the 16 in width ensures plenty of space , and that 16:10 look proportion supply vertical tangible estate .
That ’s not all . The 120Hz refresh rate guarantees tranquil movement in apps and games , and the OLED technology underneath means perfect inglorious level and dividing line .
On newspaper then , that ’s great and in practice it ’s honorable – but that ’s it .
The panel ’s brightness level of 406 nits is acceptable for most position , but sunlight could prove tricksy , and while HDR raises that level to 572 nits , that ’s not telling for HDR .
The OLED renders 100 % of the sRGB gamut at 170 % book and make 98.9 % of the DCI - P3 colour place and 95.1 % of the Adobe RGB space . Those figures are right and flux with the OLED screen to create sheer , bright semblance .
However , that 95.1 % figure in the Adobe RGB outer space is n’t quite good enough to satiate the most demanding creatives , who ask perfect Adobe reproduction , and the Delta E of 3.12 is suitable for routine originative workloads but not solely precise enough for high - closing professional work load . There are also no option to switch to alternative colour profiles .
This is not a unfit concealment at all – it ’s bluff and punchy and has fantabulous demarcation and colours . It ’s great for most creative workload and knot well than the panel inside either rival but while it ’s easily beneficial enough for most creative place , it does n’t quite have the brightness or accuracy to handle every colour - ground task you could throw at it .
Performance
Creative work necessitate rich HP , and the Swift does n’t let down . The AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS mainframe has eight multi - threaded inwardness that top out at 5.1GHz and it sit alongside 16 GB of dual - channel memory and a 1 TB PCIe Gen 4 SSD .
Most interestingly , there ’s also an Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 laptop computer GPU operate at its full magnate allocation of 100W. It may be the entry - level core in this chain , but it ’ll outpace any desegregate chip shot .
In Geekbench 6 ’s single- and multi - core run it score 2,478 and 12,177 points : the former is better than any rival , and the latter is about 33 % ripe than the option Acer and Asus machines I ’ve cite . The Core i9 - 13900H in the Huawei is faster , but not by much .
The AMD chip inside the Swift ticktock the Huawei ’s Intel CPU in PC Mark 10 by about 8 % , and the Ryzen processor is a short faster in both Cinebench R23 runs .
It ’s a groovy scratch , and the GPU does n’t waver : its Time Spy score of 7657 is doubly as quick as any Intel integrated chip . The SSD ’s say and compose hurrying of 6,581MB / s and 4,348MB / s are great for stay fresh stride with tough apps .
The Acer will blitz through any workaday workloads without ailment , it ’ll manage photo- and video - editing , and you may do plan and encoding work alongside some esports or clean play . While sports fan dissonance is present if you push the internals , it ’s never too loud .
The only negative here is the underside , which gets too live through prolonged , involve usage , and the only reasonableness to wait elsewhere is if the Intel central processing unit in the Huawei laptop computer is a better choice for the specific apps you take to run .
If you ’re buying in the US then you ’re in luck : the Acer ’s $ 1,599 monetary value actually includes a Ryzen 9 7940HS mainframe with a slight speed boost .
Software
The AcerSense app collates Windows ’ own power , performance , and update options , and there are a duad of other Acer apps that treat documents , enrollment , and sound .
Elsewhere , the taskbar includes pre - set up shortcut for Booking.com and Dropbox , and McAfee antivirus comes installed and pops up every so often with annoying windows .
Scroll down the app list and you ’ll find additions like Evernote , ExpressVPN and game like Forge of Empires .
The Swift ’s software loadout is not defective or intrusive , but there ’s nothing of picky interest to creatives .
Battery
In an routine media playback test with the panel at half brightness , the Acer lasted for eight hours and 33 hour , but in a microcomputer Mark 10 work run , with the brightness level at level best , the Swift only managed three 60 minutes and 28 minutes – a meaning drop-off .
That media figure is about level with the Acer and Asus , but hours short of the Huawei ’s twelve - hr life . While the Acer Swift regain a solid 37 % of its electric battery with a thirty - minute charge , you ’re only going to get a full day of work from this notebook computer if you ’re spare with the internals .
If you need to push the hardware with challenging creative piece of work , you ’ll be golden to make it to lunchtime . If you want a full day of creative working with a discreet GPU without plug in , you ’ll have to expend more on a originative power station from the likes of Apple .
Latest deals
Should you buy it?
The Acer ’s Leontyne Price is decent look at those internals , and it ’s decent in other departments too – just be mindful of the Swift ’s shortfalls .
The colours are n’t quite in force enough for the most challenging workload , and the barrage wo n’t last a full workings day in most situation .
Final Thoughts
Any fellowship trying to roil out a eminent - end creative laptop for $ 1,599/£1,499 has its work slue out in a world of exchangeable rivals such as theHuawei MateBook D16 ( 2024)and theMacBook Air M3 , but Acer has done well here .
Internally , the AMD processor and Nvidia GPU do a fantastic line of work of serving up creative power – there ’s enough for near any task . The Acer is comparatively quiet and has decent connectivity . The OLED control panel is bright , bold , broad and respectable enough for most creative work load , it ’s that Scripture though – most .
While the OLED panel here is good , if you spend more you ’ll get something with large Adobe power , different color profiles and spare light and pop .
Elsewhere , the Acer has a well-situated keyboard but underwhelming design and middling battery life , but these problems all require a far bigger budget to work out , and the Acer is a far better creative tool than any of its gimcrack rivals .
If you ’re happy giving up all - daytime battery life , Adobe - level character and high - end intention , the Acer Swift X 16 OLED is a great creative selection that does n’t transgress the bank .
Trusted Score
How we test
Every laptop we brush up expire through a series of undifferentiated checks design to gauge cardinal factors , including build quality , performance , screen quality and bombardment life .
These include conventional synthetic benchmarks and scripted test , plus a series of real - worldly concern checks , such as how well it runs popular apps .
FAQs
No , the Acer Swift X 16 OLED ( 2024 ) does not have a touchscreen .
Yes ! The Acer adheres to VESA DisplayHDR True Black 500 .
The Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 inside the Acer Swift X 16 organic light-emitting diode ( 2024 ) has 6 GB of consecrated memory .
Test Data
Full Specs
